Journal of Dentistry · 2023 · 20 citations · 32 references
DentistryOral SurgerySurgeryImplant SurgeryMedical RoboticsRoboticsImmediate Implant PlacementImplant Position VerificationImplant Site AssessmentImplant Treatment PlanningRobot-assisted SurgerySurgical RoboticsImmediate Implant Position AssessmentImplant Positioning AccuracySingle-tooth ScanningSurgical Implant Placement
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of dental implant placement at single-tooth sites using a novel semi-autonomous robotic-assisted surgery system (sa-RASS). METHODS: Patients with single missing teeth were included. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) was performed prior to surgery using a U-shaped silicone tube to develop a virtual implant placement and drilling plan. The sa-RASS was used for implant osteotomy and placement in conjunction with a surgeon. Cone-beam computed tomography data were utilised to evaluate deviations between planned and placed implants using a three-dimensional Slicer software. Data were analysed using the t-test and analysis of variance. Statistical significance was considered at P<0.05. RESULTS: Nineteen implants were placed using the sa-RASS. No adverse events or complications were observed during the surgery. Mean ± standard deviations between planned and postoperative implant positions were 0.90 ± 0.41 mm at the platform, 1.04 ± 0.47 mm at the apex, and 3.37 ± 1.51° for angulation. In a lateral direction, deviations were 0.72 ± 0.38 mm and 0.88 ± 0.47 mm at the platform and apex, respectively. Deviations in depth were all <1mm at both the platform (0.46 ± 0.33 mm) and apex (0.45 ± 0.32 mm). The apex deviation was greater than that at the platform (p = 0.036 < 0.05), mainly in the lateral distance (p = 0.037 < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The current study illustrate that this robotic implant system is sufficiently accurate for single-tooth implant placement. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: This study provides significant evidence to support the use of sa-RASS as a potential alternative to static guided surgery and dynamic navigation, in dental implant surgery.
32
Tabea Flügge, Wiebe Derksen, Jobine te Poel et al. · Clinical Oral Implants Research · 2016 · 201 citations · Full text
Wiebe Derksen, Daniël Wismeijer, Tabea Flügge et al. · Clinical Oral Implants Research · 2019 · 153 citations
Jörg Ruppin, Aleksandra Popović, Elmar Spüntrup et al. · Clinical Oral Implants Research · 2008 · 151 citations