New England Journal of Medicine · 2023 · 213 citations · 17 references
MedicineOncologyPharmacologyCancer PharmacologyChemotherapyMedical OncologyCombination Cancer TherapyCombination ChemotherapyLung Cancer PharmacotherapyAnaplastic Lymphoma Kinase InhibitorsControl Group DesignMatched Control GroupNon-small Cell Lung Cancer TherapyNon-small Cell Lung Cancer TreatmentPembrolizumab TherapyPlatinum-based RegimensRet Inhibitors
BACKGROUND: fusion-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in a nonrandomized phase 1-2 study. METHODS: In a randomized phase 3 trial, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of first-line selpercatinib as compared with control treatment that consisted of platinum-based chemotherapy with or without pembrolizumab at the investigator's discretion. The primary end point was progression-free survival assessed by blinded independent central review in both the intention-to-treat-pembrolizumab population (i.e., patients whose physicians had planned to treat them with pembrolizumab in the event that they were assigned to the control group) and the overall intention-to-treat population. Crossover from the control group to the selpercatinib group was allowed if disease progression as assessed by blinded independent central review occurred during receipt of control treatment. RESULTS: In total, 212 patients underwent randomization in the intention-to-treat-pembrolizumab population. At the time of the preplanned interim efficacy analysis, median progression-free survival was 24.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 16.9 to not estimable) with selpercatinib and 11.2 months (95% CI, 8.8 to 16.8) with control treatment (hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.31 to 0.70; P<0.001). The percentage of patients with an objective response was 84% (95% CI, 76 to 90) with selpercatinib and 65% (95% CI, 54 to 75) with control treatment. The cause-specific hazard ratio for the time to progression affecting the central nervous system was 0.28 (95% CI, 0.12 to 0.68). Efficacy results in the overall intention-to-treat population (261 patients) were similar to those in the intention-to-treat-pembrolizumab population. The adverse events that occurred with selpercatinib and control treatment were consistent with those previously reported. CONCLUSIONS: fusion-positive NSCLC. (Funded by Eli Lilly and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04194944.).
17
New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)
E. Eisenhauer, P. Therasse, Jan Bogaerts et al. · European Journal of Cancer · 2008 · 29.5K citations
Pembrolizumab plus Chemotherapy in Metastatic Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Leena Gandhi, Delvys Rodríguez‐Abreu, Shirish M. Gadgeel et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2018 · 6.6K citations · Full text
Medicine, Oncology, Pharmacology +16
Justin F. Gainor, Alice T. Shaw, Lecia V. Sequist et al. · Clinical Cancer Research · 2016 · 1.2K citations · Full text
Medicine, Oncology, Pharmacology +17