BMJ Open Respiratory Research · 2023 · 15 citations · 10 references
MedicineInternal MedicineHealth Services ResearchPulmonary Function TestingPulmonologyDyspnea AssessmentDyspnea ManagementInterstitial Lung DiseasePulmonary AssessmentRespiratory DiseaseRespiratory MonitoringForced Vital Capacity ChangeForced Vital Capacity Measurement QualityHome Pulmonary AssessmentInformed ConsentInterstitial Lung Disease AssessmentQualitative InterviewingRoutine Home CareSpirometry
BACKGROUND: Opportunities for home-monitoring are increasing exponentially. Home- spirometry is reproducible and reliable in interstitial lung disease (ILD), yet patients' experiences are not reported. Given the morbidity and mortality associated with ILDs, maintaining health-related quality-of-life is vital. We report our findings from a codesigned, qualitative study capturing the perspectives and experiences of patients using home-spirometry in a UK regional ILD National Health Service England (NHSE) commissioned service. METHODS: Patients eligible for home-spirometry as routine clinical care, able to give consent and able to access a smart phone were invited to participate. In-depth, semistructured interviews were conducted at serial time points (baseline, 1, 3 and 6 months), recorded, transcribed and analysed thematically. RESULTS: We report on the experiences of 10 recruited patients (8 males; median age 66 years, range 50-82 years; 7 diagnosed with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, 3 other ILDs) who generally found spirometry convenient and easy to use, but their relationships with forced vital capacity results were complex. Main themes emerging were: (1) anticipated benefits-to identify change, trigger action and aid understanding of condition; (2) needs-clinical oversight and feedback, understanding of results, ownership, need for data and a need 'to know'; (3) emotional impact-worry, reassurance, ambivalence/conflicting feelings, reminder of health issues, indifference; (4) ease of home-spirometry-simplicity, convenience and (5) difficulties with home-spirometry-technical issues, technique, physical effort. CONCLUSION: Home-spirometry has many benefits, but in view of the potential risks to psychological well-being, must be considered on an individual basis. Informed consent and decision-making are essential and should be ongoing, acknowledging potential limitations as well as benefits. Healthcare support is vital.
10
Ganesh Raghu, Harold R. Collard, Jim Egan et al. · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · 2011 · 7.3K citations · Full text
Remote management of covid-19 using home pulse oximetry and virtual ward support
Trisha Greenhalgh, Matthew Knight, Matthew Inada-Kim et al. · BMJ · 2021 · 175 citations · Full text