Japanese Journal of Radiology · 2023 · 134 citations · 12 references
ComputingHealth InformaticsRadiologyClinical InformaticsDiagnostic ReasoningNatural Language ProcessingRadiology InformaticsTest ValidityClinical Language ModelsClinical Reasoning QuestionsFisher’s Exact TestLarge Language ModelsMcnemar's TestQuestion Answering Systems EvaluationRadiology Natural Language Processing
PURPOSE: Herein, we assessed the accuracy of large language models (LLMs) in generating responses to questions in clinical radiology practice. We compared the performance of ChatGPT, GPT-4, and Google Bard using questions from the Japan Radiology Board Examination (JRBE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In total, 103 questions from the JRBE 2022 were used with permission from the Japan Radiological Society. These questions were categorized by pattern, required level of thinking, and topic. McNemar's test was used to compare the proportion of correct responses between the LLMs. Fisher's exact test was used to assess the performance of GPT-4 for each topic category. RESULTS: ChatGPT, GPT-4, and Google Bard correctly answered 40.8% (42 of 103), 65.0% (67 of 103), and 38.8% (40 of 103) of the questions, respectively. GPT-4 significantly outperformed ChatGPT by 24.2% (p < 0.001) and Google Bard by 26.2% (p < 0.001). In the categorical analysis by level of thinking, GPT-4 correctly answered 79.7% of the lower-order questions, which was significantly higher than ChatGPT or Google Bard (p < 0.001). The categorical analysis by question pattern revealed GPT-4's superiority over ChatGPT (67.4% vs. 46.5%, p = 0.004) and Google Bard (39.5%, p < 0.001) in the single-answer questions. The categorical analysis by topic revealed that GPT-4 outperformed ChatGPT (40%, p = 0.013) and Google Bard (26.7%, p = 0.004). No significant differences were observed between the LLMs in the categories not mentioned above. The performance of GPT-4 was significantly better in nuclear medicine (93.3%) than in diagnostic radiology (55.8%; p < 0.001). GPT-4 also performed better on lower-order questions than on higher-order questions (79.7% vs. 45.5%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: ChatGPTplus based on GPT-4 scored 65% when answering Japanese questions from the JRBE, outperforming ChatGPT and Google Bard. This highlights the potential of using LLMs to address advanced clinical questions in the field of radiology in Japan.
12
Aidan Gilson, Conrad Safranek, Thomas Huang et al. · JMIR Medical Education · 2023 · 2K citations · Full text
Capabilities of GPT-4 on Medical Challenge Problems
Harsha Nori, Nicholas King, Scott Mayer McKinney et al. · arXiv (Cornell University) · 2023 · 510 citations · Full text
Towards Expert-Level Medical Question Answering with Large Language Models
Karan Singhal, Tao Tu, Juraj Gottweis et al. · arXiv (Cornell University) · 2023 · 334 citations · Full text