Regenerative Biomaterials · 2023 · 23 citations · 56 references
EngineeringBioengineeringBiomedical EngineeringBiomaterialsBone GraftingTissue EngineeringBioceramicsBone TissueBone Tissue EngineeringRegenerative ScaffoldsScaffold FabricationTissue Engineering Scaffolds3D-printed ScaffoldsMandibular Bone Tissue EngineeringOsteoconductive MaterialsPorous Scaffold Bone SubstitutesPorous ScaffoldsThree-dimensional Printed ScaffoldsTricalcium Phosphate BiomaterialsTricalcium Phosphate Scaffolds
Abstract The 3D printing process of fused deposition modelling is an attractive fabrication approach to create tissue-engineered bone substitutes to regenerate large mandibular bone defects, but often lacks desired surface porosity for enhanced protein adsorption and cell adhesion. Solvent-based printing leads to the spontaneous formation of micropores on the scaffold’s surface upon solvent removal, without the need for further post processing. Our aim is to create and characterize porous scaffolds using a new formulation composed of mechanically stable poly(lactic-co-glycol acid) and osteoconductive β-tricalcium phosphate with and without the addition of elastic thermoplastic polyurethane prepared by solvent-based 3D-printing technique. Large-scale regenerative scaffolds can be 3D-printed with adequate fidelity and show porosity at multiple levels analysed via micro-computer tomography, scanning electron microscopy and N2 sorption. Superior mechanical properties compared to a commercially available calcium phosphate ink are demonstrated in compression and screw pull out tests. Biological assessments including cell activity assay and live-dead staining prove the scaffold’s cytocompatibility. Osteoconductive properties are demonstrated by performing an osteogenic differentiation assay with primary human bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells. We propose a versatile fabrication process to create porous 3D-printed scaffolds with adequate mechanical stability and osteoconductivity, both important characteristics for segmental mandibular bone reconstruction.
56
Matthias Thommes, Katsumi Kaneko, Alexander V. Neimark et al. · Pure and Applied Chemistry · 2015 · 19.8K citations
Biomaterials & scaffolds for tissue engineering
Fergal J. O’Brien · Materials Today · 2011 · 3.4K citations · Full text