Publication | Closed Access
Beyond Social Capital: Spatial Dynamics of Collective Efficacy for Children
541
Citations
43
References
1999
Year
Social ContextStructural SourcesSocial SciencesDevelopmental PsychologyBiosocial InteractionsUrban SocietySurvey DataPublic HealthSocial CapitalHousingSpatial TheoryChild PsychologySocial EnvironmentEarly Childhood DevelopmentSocial ImpactChild DevelopmentCommunity ParticipationCollective EfficacyUrban GeographyResidential DevelopmentCommunity DevelopmentCommunity EnvironmentSociologyUrban EconomicsSpatial DemographyDemographyGentrificationUrban Space
The study proposes a theoretical framework linking structural sources and spatial dynamics to collective efficacy for children. Using 1995 Chicago survey data from 8,782 residents across 342 neighborhoods, the authors analyze intergenerational closure, reciprocal exchange, and shared expectations for informal social control, adjusting for individual attributes and neighborhood census characteristics while accounting for spatial interdependence. Findings reveal that residential stability and concentrated affluence drive intergenerational closure and reciprocal exchange, while concentrated disadvantage lowers expectations for shared child control, and spatial proximity to high‑efficacy neighborhoods confers advantages—particularly for white neighborhoods—beyond local structural factors.
We propose a theoretical framework on the structural sources and spatially embedded nature of three mechanisms that produce collective efficacy for children. Using survey data collected in 1995 from 8,782 Chicago residents, we examine variations in intergenerational closure, reciprocal local exchange, and shared expectations for informal social control across 342 neighborhoods. Adjusting for respondents’ attributes, we assess the effects of neighborhood characteristics measured in the 1990 census and the role of spatial interdependence. The results show that residential stability and concentrated affluence, more so than poverty and racial/ethnic composition, predict intergenerational closure and reciprocal exchange. Concentrated disadvantage, by contrast, is associated with sharply lower expectations for shared child control. The importance of spatial dynamics in generating collective efficacy for children is highlighted—proximity to areas high in closure, exchange, and control bestows an advantage above and beyond the structural characteristics of a given neighborhood. Moreover, spatial advantages are much more likely to accrue to white neighborhoods than to black neighborhoods.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1