European Spine Journal · 2023 · 22 citations · 45 references
MedicineOrthopaedic SurgeryOrthopedic SurgeryNeuromusculoskeletal AssessmentSpinal BiomechanicsSpine SurgeryDegenerative Spine DiseaseLumbar Spine SurgerySpinal AlignmentSpinal AssessmentSpinal DisordersSpine DisordersClassification System DesignInterobserver Reliability AssessmentKappa CoefficientKappa StatisticLumbar Spinal InstabilityLumbar Spine DisordersSegmental InstabilitySpinal Sagittal Alignment
PURPOSE: To review existing classification systems for degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS), propose a novel classification designed to better address clinically relevant radiographic and clinical features of disease, and determine the inter- and intraobserver reliability of this new system for classifying DS. METHODS: The proposed classification system includes four components: 1) segmental dynamic instability, 2) location of spinal stenosis, 3) sagittal alignment, and 4) primary clinical presentation. To establish the reliability of this system, 12 observers graded 10 premarked test cases twice each. Kappa values were calculated to assess the inter- and intraobserver reliability for each of the four components separately. RESULTS: Interobserver reliability for dynamic instability, location of stenosis, sagittal alignment, and clinical presentation was 0.94, 0.80, 0.87, and 1.00, respectively. Intraobserver reliability for dynamic instability, location of stenosis, sagittal alignment, and clinical presentation were 0.91, 0.88, 0.87, and 0.97, respectively. CONCLUSION: The UCSF DS classification system provides a novel framework for assessing DS based on radiographic and clinical parameters with established implications for surgical treatment. The almost perfect interobserver and intraobserver reliability observed for all components of this system demonstrates that it is simple and easy to use. In clinical practice, this classification may allow subclassification of similar patients into groups that may benefit from distinct treatment strategies, leading to the development of algorithms to help guide selection of an optimal surgical approach. Future work will focus on the clinical validation of this system, with the goal of providing for more evidence-based, standardized approaches to treatment and improved outcomes for patients with DS.
45
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
J. Richard Landis, Gary G. Koch · Biometrics · 1977 · 78.9K citations · Full text
The Impact of Positive Sagittal Balance in Adult Spinal Deformity
Steven D. Glassman, Keith H. Bridwell, John R. Dimar et al. · Spine · 2005 · 1.9K citations
Scoliosis Research Society—Schwab Adult Spinal Deformity Classification
Frank Schwab, Benjamin Ungar, Benjamin Blondel et al. · Spine · 2011 · 1.3K citations
Pelvic Tilt and Truncal Inclination
Virginie Lafage, Frank J. Schwab, Ashish Patel et al. · Spine · 2009 · 1.2K citations
United States Trends in Lumbar Fusion Surgery for Degenerative Conditions
Richard A. Deyo, Darryl T. Gray, William Kreuter et al. · Spine · 2005 · 998 citations