Association of quantitative measures of medial meniscal extrusion with structural and symptomatic knee osteoarthritis progression – Data from the OAI FNIH biomarker study

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the association of quantitative medial meniscal position measures with radiographic and symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (OA) progression over 2-4 years. METHODS: The FNIH OAI Biomarkers study comprised 600 participants in four subgroups: 194 case knees with combined structural (medial minimum joint space width (minJSW) loss ≥0.7 mm) and symptomatic (persistent Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain subscale increase ≥9 [0-100 scale]) progression; 200 knees with neither structural nor symptomatic progression; 103 knees with isolated structural and 103 with isolated symptomatic progression. Coronal double echo at steady state (DESS) MRIs were used for segmenting five central slices of the medial meniscus. Associations with progression were examined using logistic regression (adjusted for demographic and clinical data). RESULTS: Greater baseline medial meniscal extrusion was associated with combined structural/symptomatic progression (OR 1.59; 95%CI: [1.25,2.04]). No relationship was observed for tibial plateau coverage or meniscal overlap distance. The two-year increase in meniscal extrusion (OR 1.48 [1.21, 1.83]), and reduction in tibial plateau coverage (OR 0.70 [0.58,0.86]) and overlap distance (OR 0.73 [0.60,0.89]) were associated with combined progression. Greater baseline extrusion was associated with isolated structural and less extrusion with isolated symptomatic progression. The longitudinal increase in meniscal extrusion, and reduction in tibial plateau coverage and overlap distance were associated with structural, but not with symptomatic progression. CONCLUSION: Baseline measures of medial meniscal extrusion were consistently positively associated with combined radiographic/symptomatic progression and with isolated structural, but not with isolated symptomatic progression. These measures may therefore allow one to assess the risk of structural knee OA progression and to monitor interventions restoring meniscal position and function.