Annals of Internal Medicine · 2023 · 34 citations · 29 references
Public HealthCardiologyPreventive MedicineEpidemiologic MethodsEpidemiologyPopulation HealthAnalytic EpidemiologyAtherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease PreventionCardiovascular DiseaseCardiovascular Disease PreventionCardiovascular EpidemiologyChronic Disease DisparitiesAtherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk EstimationAtherosclerotic Cardiovascular Risk ReductionAtherosclerotic Disease PreventionCardiovascular Health DisparitiesComparative Disease SeverityDisease Severity EstimationUnequal TreatmentUnobserved Confounding
BACKGROUND: Although statins are a class I recommendation for prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and its complications, their use is suboptimal. Differential underuse may mediate disparities in cardiovascular health for systematically marginalized persons. OBJECTIVE: To estimate disparities in statin use by race-ethnicity-gender and to determine whether these potential disparities are explained by medical appropriateness of therapy and structural factors. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis. SETTING: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey from 2015 to 2020. PARTICIPANTS: Persons eligible for statin therapy based on 2013 and 2018 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association blood cholesterol guidelines. MEASUREMENTS: The independent variable was race-ethnicity-gender. The outcome of interest was use of a statin. Using the Institute of Medicine framework for examining unequal treatment, we calculated adjusted prevalence ratios (aPRs) to estimate disparities in statin use adjusted for age, disease severity, access to health care, and socioeconomic status relative to non-Hispanic White men. RESULTS: For primary prevention, we identified a lower prevalence of statin use that was not explained by measurable differences in disease severity or structural factors among non-Hispanic Black men (aPR, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.59 to 0.88]) and non-Mexican Hispanic women (aPR, 0.74 [CI, 0.53 to 0.95]). For secondary prevention, we identified a lower prevalence of statin use that was not explained by measurable differences in disease severity or structural factors for non-Hispanic Black men (aPR, 0.81 [CI, 0.64 to 0.97]), other/multiracial men (aPR, 0.58 [CI, 0.20 to 0.97]), Mexican American women (aPR, 0.36 [CI, 0.10 to 0.61]), non-Mexican Hispanic women (aPR, 0.57 [CI, 0.33 to 0.82), non-Hispanic White women (aPR, 0.69 [CI, 0.56 to 0.83]), and non-Hispanic Black women (aPR, 0.75 [CI, 0.57 to 0.92]). LIMITATION: Cross-sectional data; lack of geographic, language, or statin-dose data. CONCLUSION: Statin use disparities for several race-ethnicity-gender groups are not explained by measurable differences in medical appropriateness of therapy, access to health care, and socioeconomic status. These residual disparities may be partially mediated by unobserved processes that contribute to health inequity, including bias, stereotyping, and mistrust. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: National Institutes of Health.
29
Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2019 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association
Emelia J. Benjamin, Paul Muntner, Álvaro Alonso et al. · Circulation · 2019 · 9.1K citations · Full text
Neil J. Stone, Jennifer G. Robinson, Alice H. Lichtenstein et al. · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2013 · 3.9K citations · Full text
2013 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Assessment of Cardiovascular Risk
David C. Goff, Donald M. Lloyd‐Jones, Glen C. Bennett et al. · Circulation · 2013 · 3.7K citations · Full text