Annals of Surgery · 2023 · 18 citations · 39 references
MedicineOncologyPharmacologyChemotherapyGastrointestinal OncologyMolecular OncologyPancreatic CancerTherapy Response AssessmentAnticancer ChemotherapyCancer Antigen 19-9Chemotherapy Response AssessmentCox RegressionHistologic Response AssessmentMinimum Response LevelsMulticenter TrialsTherapy Response Evaluation
OBJECTIVE: This nationwide multicenter study aimed to define clinically relevant thresholds of relative serum CA19-9 response after 2 months of induction chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). BACKGROUND: CA19-9 is seen as leading biomarker for response evaluation in patients with LAPC, but early clinically useful cut-offs are lacking. METHODS: All consecutive patients with LAPC after 4 cycles (m)FOLFIRINOX or 2 cycles gemcitabine-nab-paclitaxel induction chemotherapy (±radiotherapy) with CA19-9 ≥5 U/mL at baseline were analyzed (2015-2019). The association of CA19-9 response with median OS (mOS) was evaluated for different CA19-9 cut-off points. Minimum and optimal CA19-9 response were established via log-rank test. Predictors for OS were analyzed using COX regression analysis. RESULTS: Overall, 212 patients were included, of whom 42 (19.8%) underwent resection. Minimum CA19-9 response demonstrating a clinically significant median OS difference (12.7 vs. 19.6 months) was seen at ≥40% CA19-9 decrease. The optimal cutoff for CA19-9 response was ≥60% decrease (21.7 vs. 14.0 mo, P =0.021). Only for patients with elevated CA19-9 levels at baseline (n=184), CA19-9 decrease ≥60% [hazard ratio (HR)=0.59, 95% CI, 0.36-0.98, P =0.042] was independently associated with prolonged OS, as were SBRT (HR=0.42, 95% CI, 0.25-0.70; P =0.001), and resection (HR=0.25, 95% CI, 0.14-0.46, P <0.001), and duration of chemotherapy (HR=0.75, 95% CI, 0.69-0.82, P <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: CA19-9 decrease of ≥60% following induction chemotherapy as optimal response cut-off in patients with LAPC is an independent predictor for OS when CA19-9 is increased at baseline. Furthermore, ≥40% is the minimum cut-off demonstrating survival benefit. These cut-offs may be used when discussing treatment strategies during early response evaluation.
39
New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)
E. Eisenhauer, P. Therasse, Jan Bogaerts et al. · European Journal of Cancer · 2008 · 29.5K citations
Erik von Elm, Douglas G. Altman, Matthias Egger et al. · Annals of Internal Medicine · 2007 · 17.2K citations
Public Health, Public Health Practice, Epidemiologic Methods +10
Erik von Elm, Douglas G. Altman, Matthias Egger et al. · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2008 · 16.4K citations · Full text
Public Health, Public Health Practice, Epidemiologic Methods +10
The Clavien-Dindo Classification of Surgical Complications
Pierre A. Clavien, Jeffrey Barkun, Michelle Oliveira et al. · Annals of Surgery · 2009 · 11.3K citations
Estimated Projection of US Cancer Incidence and Death to 2040
Lola Rahib, Mackenzie R. Wehner, Lynn M. Matrisian et al. · JAMA Network Open · 2021 · 1.3K citations · Full text
Medicine, Health Policy, Oncology +17