Scientific Reports · 2023 · 24 citations · 55 references
MedicineGeriatric MedicineFunctional Movement AssessmentPhysical ActivitySarcopeniaDiagnostic Criteria For SarcopeniaGait AssessmentMuscle Mass AssessmentMuscle Strength AssessmentSarcopenia DiagnosisSarcopenia ScreeningAge-related Muscle Loss AssessmentDiagnostic Performance MetricsHandgrip Strength TestingSarc-f QuestionnaireSarcopenia In Community-dwelling AdultsSarcopenia In Older AdultsSarcopenia Screening ToolsWalking Speed
Abstract To compare the performance of SARC-F and SARC-CalF as screening tools for sarcopenia. Cross-sectional study with a convenience sample of 312 community-dwelling older people. Sarcopenia was defined as low handgrip strength (HGS) or low gait speed (GS ≤ 0.8 m/s). HGS was measured by dynamometry and GS by the 4-m walking speed test. For HGS, six criteria (C) were used to identify sarcopenia in men/women: C I : < 27 kg/16 kg; C II : < 35.5 kg/20.0 kg; C III : grip over body mass index < 1.05/< 0.79; C IV : grip strength over total body fat < 1.66/< 0.65; C V : grip over bodyweight < 0.45/< 0.34; C VI : < 27 kg/16 kg and low skeletal muscle mass index (SMMI); C I and C VI defined according to the European Working Group on sarcopenia in older people and the rest according to the sarcopenia definition and outcomes Consortium. For sarcopenia screening, the SARC-F (≥ 4 points) and the SARC-CalF (≥ 11 points) were used. The kappa analysis revealed no agreement between the SARC-F and the various criteria for the identification of sarcopenia in men. The same lack of agreement was observed in women with some exceptions: C I = 0.161 ± 0.074, p = 0.020; GS = 0.209 ± 0.076, p = 0.003. Concerning the Cohen’s kappa between the SARC-Calf and the reference criteria of sarcopenia, the following coefficients were observed as significant for women: C I = 0.201 ± 0.069, p = 0.003; C II = 0.186 ± 0.064, p = 0.005; GS = 0.273 ± 0.068, p = 0.0001; and for men: C II = 0.139 ± 0.053, p = 0.021; GS = 0.223 ± 0.099, p = 0.011. ROC curves revealed the SARC-Calf with acceptable discrimination and reasonable sarcopenia predictive capacity considering a cutoff value of 10.5 in both men (AUC: 67.5%, p = 0.022; Se = 52.9%; Sp = 76.8%) and women (AUC: 72.4%, p < 0.001; Se = 63%; Sp = 68.5%) concerning GS. The SARC-CalF performed better than the SARC-F for screening sarcopenia in the population ≥ 60 years of age in the Amazonas, measured through walking slowness.
55
Marshal F. Folstein, Susan E. Folstein, Paul R. McHugh · Journal of Psychiatric Research · 1975 · 86.9K citations
Older Adults' Reasons for Using Technology while Aging in Place
Sebastiaan Theodorus Michaël Peek, Katrien Luijkx, M. D. Rijnaard et al. · Gerontology · 2015 · 19.7K citations · Full text