Concepedia

TLDR

Generative AI tools such as ChatGPT have become central to discussions about their economic, societal, and environmental impacts, yet their effects on employment—whether displacement, creation, or mere labor shift—remain uncertain amid an escalating AI arms race that raises concerns about well‑being, bias, misinformation, privacy, ethics, and security. This editorial proposes a set of perspectives and research directions to advance human resource management scholarship in the context of generative AI. It synthesizes existing AI literature and links it to HRM processes, practices, relationships, and outcomes, thereby outlining a framework for future research.

Abstract

Abstract ChatGPT and its variants that use generative artificial intelligence (AI) models have rapidly become a focal point in academic and media discussions about their potential benefits and drawbacks across various sectors of the economy, democracy, society, and environment. It remains unclear whether these technologies result in job displacement or creation, or if they merely shift human labour by generating new, potentially trivial or practically irrelevant, information and decisions. According to the CEO of ChatGPT, the potential impact of this new family of AI technology could be as big as “the printing press”, with significant implications for employment, stakeholder relationships, business models, and academic research, and its full consequences are largely undiscovered and uncertain. The introduction of more advanced and potent generative AI tools in the AI market, following the launch of ChatGPT, has ramped up the “AI arms race”, creating continuing uncertainty for workers, expanding their business applications, while heightening risks related to well‐being, bias, misinformation, context insensitivity, privacy issues, ethical dilemmas, and security. Given these developments, this perspectives editorial offers a collection of perspectives and research pathways to extend HRM scholarship in the realm of generative AI. In doing so, the discussion synthesizes the literature on AI and generative AI, connecting it to various aspects of HRM processes, practices, relationships, and outcomes, thereby contributing to shaping the future of HRM research.

References

YearCitations

Page 1