The Lancet Regional Health - Europe · 2023 · 123 citations · 30 references
MedicineOncologySurgeryGeneral SurgeryOncologic SurgerySurgical OncologyLaparoscopic SurgeryMinimally Invasive Cancer SurgeryMinimally Invasive SurgeryPancreatic CancerPancreatic SurgeryTumor Resection TechniquesLaparoscopic Pancreatic SurgeryMinimally Invasive Pancreatic ResectionMinimally Invasive Pancreatic SurgeryPancreatic Cancer ResectionR0 ResectionRadical ResectionRobotic PancreatectomyRobotic Pancreatic Surgery
Background: The oncological safety of minimally invasive surgery has been questioned for several abdominal cancers. Concerns also exist regarding the use of minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer as randomised trials are lacking. Methods: In this international randomised non-inferiority trial, we recruited adults with resectable pancreatic cancer from 35 centres in 12 countries. Patients were randomly assigned to either MIDP (laparoscopic or robotic) or open distal pancreatectomy (ODP). Both patients and pathologists were blinded to the assigned approach. Primary endpoint was radical resection (R0, ≥1 mm free margin) in patients who had ultimately undergone resection. Analyses for the primary endpoint were by modified intention-to-treat, excluding patients with missing data on primary endpoint. The pre-defined non-inferiority margin of -7% was compared with the lower limit of the two-sided 90% confidence interval (CI) of absolute difference in the primary endpoint. This trial is registered with the ISRCTN registry (ISRCTN44897265). Findings: = 0.039). Median lymph node yield was comparable (22.0 [16.0-30.0] vs 23.0 [14.0-32.0] nodes, p = 0.86), as was the rate of intraperitoneal recurrence (41% vs 38%, p = 0.45). Median follow-up was 23.5 (interquartile range 17.0-30.0) months. Other postoperative outcomes were comparable, including median time to functional recovery (5 [95% CI 4.5-5.5] vs 5 [95% CI 4.7-5.3] days; p = 0.22) and overall survival (HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.67-1.46, p = 0.94). Serious adverse events were reported in 23 (18%) of 131 patients in the MIDP group vs 28 (22%) of 127 patients in the ODP group. Interpretation: This trial provides evidence on the non-inferiority of MIDP compared to ODP regarding radical resection rates in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer. The present findings support the applicability of minimally invasive surgery in patients with resectable left-sided pancreatic cancer. Funding: Medtronic Covidien AG, Johnson & Johnson Medical Limited, Dutch Gastroenterology Society.
30
Rebecca L. Siegel, Kimberly D. Miller, Hannah E. Fuchs et al. · CA A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · 2022 · 18.2K citations · Full text
John P. Neoptolemos, Daniel H. Palmer, Paula Ghaneh et al. · The Lancet · 2017 · 1.9K citations · Full text
Medicine, Oncology, Pharmacotherapy +17
Minimally Invasive versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer
Pedro T. Ramírez, Michael Frumovitz, René Pareja et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2018 · 1.9K citations · Full text
Medicine, Gynecology, Surgery +15