Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · 2023 · 10 citations · 30 references
The use of machine learning models in consequential decision making often exacerbates societal inequity, in particular yielding disparate impact on members of marginalized groups defined by race and gender. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) is widely used to evaluate the performance of a scoring function in machine learning, but is studied in algorithmic fairness less than other performance metrics. Due to the pairwise nature of the AUC, defining an AUC-based group fairness metric is pairwise-dependent and may involve both intra-group and inter-group AUCs. Importantly, considering only one category of AUCs is not sufficient to mitigate unfairness in AUC optimization. In this paper, we propose a minimax learning and bias mitigation framework that incorporates both intra-group and inter-group AUCs while maintaining utility. Based on this Rawlsian framework, we design an efficient stochastic optimization algorithm and prove its convergence to the minimum group-level AUC. We conduct numerical experiments on both synthetic and real-world datasets to validate the effectiveness of the minimax framework and the proposed optimization algorithm.
30
Justice as Fairness: A Restatement
Thaddeus Metz, John Rawls, Erin I. Kelly · The Philosophical Review · 2002 · 3.5K citations
Cynthia Dwork, Moritz Hardt, Toniann Pitassi et al. · 2012 · 3.3K citations
Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learning
Moritz Hardt, Eric Price, Nathan Srebro · arXiv (Cornell University) · 2016 · 1.9K citations · Full text
Certifying and Removing Disparate Impact
Michael Feldman, Sorelle A. Friedler, John Moeller et al. · 2015 · 1.7K citations
Protected Class, Discrimination, Law +16