Publication | Open Access
Development of a new integrated flood resilience model using machine learning with GIS-based multi-criteria decision analysis
70
Citations
87
References
2023
Year
Flood resilience assessment is an important step for any community as it gives the actual scenario of its ability to resist and recover from flood disasters. However, operationalising and quantifying resilience is still a challenge. In Pakistan, very limited research has been done to assess community resilience to floods. The present study proposed an integrated flood resilience model called the “capacity-based flood resilience model (CapFlooR-M)”, which is based on, machine learning (ML), geographical information system (GIS), remote sensing (RS), and the analytical hierarchy process (AHP). The CapFlooR-M incorporates four main components—flood hazard susceptibility ( Is ), coping capacity ( Cc ) , adaptive capacity ( Ac ) , and transformative capacity ( Tc ). Random Forest (RF) and Support Vector Machine (SVM) models were used to create a flood susceptibility map, and the AHP was used to compute the relative scores of core capacities, such as Cc , Ac , and Tc and their respective maps were generated. Finally, the susceptibility map was integrated with Cc , Ac , and Tc maps via overlay analysis in GIS to develop a flood resilience map. The overall results reveal that the northwestern and southwestern parts (36.64%; 505 km 2 ) of the study area have moderate to very high resilience, while the central and southeastern parts (63.46%; 877 km 2 ) have very low to low resilience. The findings of this novel approach can support policymakers, land use planners, and other relevant stakeholders to build resilience against flood hazards. • We developed a new capacities-based flood resilience model called CapFlooR-M. • The CapFlooR-M integrates ML, RS, GIS, and AHP techniques. • CapFlooR-M is based on susceptibility, coping, adaptive and transformative capacities. • The RF showed good results in predicting flood hazards with the highest accuracy of 0.99%. • The results would support decision makers to prepare effective mitigation plans for climate change impacts.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1