International Journal of Urology · 2023 · 17 citations · 16 references
MedicineUrologyFemale UrologyUrodynamicsUrologic SurgeryBladder DysfunctionBladder Function AssessmentDetrusor UnderactivityMale UrodynamicsUrinary IncontinenceUrodynamic EvaluationDetrusor Underactivity AssessmentLower Urinary Tract Symptom EvaluationMale Detrusor UnderactivityMale Lower Urinary Tract SymptomsOutlet Obstruction AssessmentReceiver Operating Characteristic AnalysisUrinary Symptom AssessmentUroflowmetry Patterns
Objectives To elucidate the characteristics of uroflowmetry (UFM) observed in men with detrusor underactivity (DU) using our developed artificial intelligence (AI) diagnostic algorithm to distinguish between DU and bladder outlet obstruction (BOO). Methods Subjective and objective parameters, including four UFM parameters (first peak flow rate, time to first peak, gradient to first peak, and the ratio of first peak flow rate to maximum flow rate [ Q max ]) selected by analyzing the judgment basis of the AI diagnostic system, were compared in 266 treatment‐naive men with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). Patients were divided into the DU (70; 26.32%) and non‐DU (196; 73.68%) groups, and the UFM parameters for predicting the presence of DU were determined by multivariate analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Detrusor underactivity was defined as a bladder contractility index <100 and a BOO index <40. Results Most parameters on the first peak flow of UFM were significantly lower in the DU group. On multivariate analysis, lower first peak flow rate and lower ratio of first peak flow rate to Q max were significant parameters to predict DU. In the ROC analysis, the ratio of the first peak flow rate to Q max showed the highest area under the curve (0.848) and yielded sensitivities of 76% and specificities of 83% for DU diagnosis, with cutoff values of 0.8. Conclusions Parameters on the first peak flow of UFM, especially the ratio of the first peak flow rate to Q max , can diagnose DU with high accuracy in men with LUTS.
16
Good urodynamic practices: Uroflowmetry, filling cystometry, and pressure‐flow studies**
Werner Schäfer, Paul Abrams, Limin Liao et al. · Neurourology and Urodynamics · 2002 · 1.7K citations · Full text
Medicine, Urology, Female Urology +15
Andrew Gammie, Mathilde Kaper, Caroline A. Dorrepaal et al. · European Urology · 2015 · 166 citations
Medicine, Physiology, Urology +17