Cancers · 2023 · 35 citations · 40 references
ComputingComputer ScienceOncologyElectronic Health RecordsMachine LearningPredictive AnalyticsBreast Cancer RecurrenceClinical Natural Language ProcessingElectronic Health Record AnalyticsEnsemble LearningPredictive Health ModelingRepresentation LearningCancer Prognostic ModelingCancer Recurrence RiskExtreme Gradient BoostingMachine Learning For HealthcareMachine Learning Prediction ModelsPatient Risk StratificationPatient-specific Risk StratificationPredictive Outcome Modeling
Recurrence is a critical aspect of breast cancer (BC) that is inexorably tied to mortality. Reuse of healthcare data through Machine Learning (ML) algorithms offers great opportunities to improve the stratification of patients at risk of cancer recurrence. We hypothesized that combining features from structured and unstructured sources would provide better prediction results for 5-year cancer recurrence than either source alone. We collected and preprocessed clinical data from a cohort of BC patients, resulting in 823 valid subjects for analysis. We derived three sets of features: structured information, features from free text, and a combination of both. We evaluated the performance of five ML algorithms to predict 5-year cancer recurrence and selected the best-performing to test our hypothesis. The XGB (eXtreme Gradient Boosting) model yielded the best performance among the five evaluated algorithms, with precision = 0.900, recall = 0.907, F1-score = 0.897, and area under the receiver operating characteristic AUROC = 0.807. The best prediction results were achieved with the structured dataset, followed by the unstructured dataset, while the combined dataset achieved the poorest performance. ML algorithms for BC recurrence prediction are valuable tools to improve patient risk stratification, help with post-cancer monitoring, and plan more effective follow-up. Structured data provides the best results when fed to ML algorithms. However, an approach based on natural language processing offers comparable results while potentially requiring less mapping effort.
40
Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python
Fabián Pedregosa, Gaël Varoquaux, Alexandre Gramfort et al. · arXiv (Cornell University) · 2012 · 63.7K citations · Full text
SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python
Nature Methods · 2020 · 37.9K citations · Full text
SMOTE: Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique
Nitesh V. Chawla, Kevin W. Bowyer, Lawrence Hall et al. · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · 2002 · 31.2K citations · Full text