New England Journal of Medicine · 2023 · 547 citations · 33 references
PharmacyHematologyPharmacotherapyStem Cell TransplantationTransplant ImmunologyTransplant PharmacotherapyAllogeneic Stem Cell TransplantationCalcineurin Inhibitor TherapyCalcineurin InhibitorsGraft-versus-host DiseaseHematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant PharmacotherapyTransplant PharmacologyAllogeneic Transplant PharmacotherapyCalcineurin Inhibitor ImmunosuppressionCalcineurin Inhibitor-based ProphylaxisCyclophosphamide-based ConditioningMethotrexate ProphylaxisPost-transplant CyclophosphamideTransplantation
In patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT), a calcineurin inhibitor plus methotrexate has been a standard prophylaxis against graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). A phase 2 study indicated the potential superiority of a post-transplantation regimen of cyclophosphamide, tacrolimus, and mycophenolate mofetil. Download a PDF of the Research Summary. In a phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned adults with hematologic cancers in a 1:1 ratio to receive cyclophosphamide–tacrolimus–mycophenolate mofetil (experimental prophylaxis) or tacrolimus–methotrexate (standard prophylaxis). The patients underwent HSCT from an HLA-matched related donor or a matched or 7/8 mismatched (i.e., mismatched at only one of the HLA-A, HLA-B, HLA-C, and HLA-DRB1 loci) unrelated donor, after reduced-intensity conditioning. The primary end point was GVHD-free, relapse-free survival at 1 year, assessed in a time-to-event analysis, with events defined as grade III or IV acute GVHD, chronic GVHD warranting systemic immunosuppression, disease relapse or progression, and death from any cause. In a multivariate Cox regression analysis, GVHD-free, relapse-free survival was significantly more common among the 214 patients in the experimental-prophylaxis group than among the 217 patients in the standard-prophylaxis group (hazard ratio for grade III or IV acute GVHD, chronic GVHD, disease relapse or progression, or death, 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.49 to 0.83; P=0.001). At 1 year, the adjusted GVHD-free, relapse-free survival was 52.7% (95% CI, 45.8 to 59.2) with experimental prophylaxis and 34.9% (95% CI, 28.6 to 41.3) with standard prophylaxis. Patients in the experimental-prophylaxis group appeared to have less severe acute or chronic GVHD and a higher incidence of immunosuppression-free survival at 1 year. Overall and disease-free survival, relapse, transplantation-related death, and engraftment did not differ substantially between the groups. Among patients undergoing allogeneic HLA-matched HSCT with reduced-intensity conditioning, GVHD-free, relapse-free survival at 1 year was significantly more common among those who received cyclophosphamide–tacrolimus–mycophenolate mofetil than among those who received tacrolimus–methotrexate. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and others; BMT CTN 1703 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03959241.) QUICK TAKE VIDEO SUMMARYGraft-versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis 02:16
33
Madan Jagasia, Hildegard Greinix, Mukta Arora et al. · Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation · 2014 · 5.4K citations · Full text
Leo Luznik, Paul V. O’Donnell, Heather J. Symons et al. · Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation · 2008 · 1.9K citations · Full text
Medicine, Hematology, Oncology +16
Defining the Intensity of Conditioning Regimens: Working Definitions
Andrea Bacigalupo, Karen K. Ballen, Doug Rizzo et al. · Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation · 2009 · 1.8K citations · Full text
Rainer Storb, H. Joachim Deeg, John Whitehead et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 1986 · 1.5K citations
Medicine, Hematology, Immunology +14
Checking the Cox model with cumulative sums of martingale-based residuals
D. Y. Lin, L. J. Wei, Z. Ying · Biometrika · 1993 · 1.4K citations