ESMO Open · 2023 · 15 citations · 25 references
MedicineMolecular GeneticsOncologyCancer GeneticsGenomicsMolecular OncologyCancer GenomicsCancer Molecular DiagnosticsGenomic ProfilingMolecular Tumor ProfilingNext-generation Sequencing In OncologyPancreatic CancerClinical Next-generation SequencingGenomic Alteration ProfilingKras Mutation AnalysisMicrosatellite Instability In Pancreatic CancerMutational GenomicsNext-generation Sequencing AnalysisNext-generation Sequencing PanelsTumor Mutation Analysis
BACKGROUND: Pancreatic cancer has a dismal prognosis. One reason is resistance to cytotoxic drugs. Molecularly matched therapies might overcome this resistance but the best approach to identify those patients who may benefit is unknown. Therefore, we sought to evaluate a molecularly guided treatment approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical outcome and mutational status of patients with pancreatic cancer who received molecular profiling at the West German Cancer Center Essen from 2016 to 2021. We carried out a 47-gene DNA next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel. Furthermore, we assessed microsatellite instability-high/deficient mismatch repair (MSI-H/dMMR) status and, sequentially and only in case of KRAS wild-type, gene fusions via RNA-based NGS. Patient data and treatment were retrieved from the electronic medical records. RESULTS: Of 190 included patients, 171 had pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (90%). One hundred and three patients had stage IV pancreatic cancer at diagnosis (54%). MMR analysis in 94 patients (94/190, 49.5%) identified 3 patients with dMMR (3/94, 3.2%). Notably, we identified 32 patients with KRAS wild-type status (16.8%). To identify driver alterations in these patients, we conducted an RNA-based fusion assay on 13 assessable samples and identified 5 potentially actionable fusions (5/13, 38.5%). Overall, we identified 34 patients with potentially actionable alterations (34/190, 17.9%). Of these 34 patients, 10 patients (10/34, 29.4%) finally received at least one molecularly targeted treatment and 4 patients had an exceptional response (>9 months on treatment). CONCLUSIONS: Here, we show that a small-sized gene panel can suffice to identify relevant therapeutic options for pancreatic cancer patients. Informally comparing with previous large-scale studies, this approach yields a similar detection rate of actionable targets. We propose molecular sequencing of pancreatic cancer as standard of care to identify KRAS wild-type and rare molecular subsets for targeted treatment strategies.
25
PD-1 Blockade in Tumors with Mismatch-Repair Deficiency
Dung T. Le, Jennifer N. Uram, Hao Wang et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2015 · 9.4K citations · Full text
Life Sciences, Immunology, Oncology +17
FOLFIRINOX versus Gemcitabine for Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer
Thierry Conroy, Françoise Desseigne, Marc Ychou et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2011 · 7.8K citations · Full text
Medicine, Oncology, Pharmacology +13
Increased Survival in Pancreatic Cancer with nab-Paclitaxel plus Gemcitabine
Daniel D. Von Hoff, Thomas J. Ervin, Francis P. Arena et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2013 · 6.7K citations
Medicine, Oncology, Pharmacology +13