The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics · 2023 · 11 citations · 23 references
DentistryDental Materials ScienceMaterials EngineeringDental MaterialsDigital ProsthodonticsProsthodontic MaterialsComputer-aided Design In ProsthodonticsDenture ProcessingDigital Denture FabricationMetal Framework FabricationCad-cam Denture FabricationComputer-aided Denture FabricationComputer-aided Manufacturing Partial DenturesLost-wax CastingLost-wax TechniqueMulti Jet FusionPolyamideRemovable Partial Denture Fabrication
PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of removable partial denture (RPD) frameworks produced using different digital protocols. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 80 frameworks for RPDs were produced using CAD-CAM technology and divided into four groups of twenty (n = 20): Group 1, Titanium frameworks manufactured by digital metal laser sintering (DMLS); Group 2, Co-Cr frameworks manufactured by DMLS; Group 3, Polyamide PA12 castable resin manufactured by multi-jet fusion (MJF); and Group 4, Metal (Co-Cr) casting by using lost-wax technique. After the digital acquisition, eight specific areas were selected in order to measure the Δ-error value at the intaglio surface of RPD. The minimum value required for point sampling density (0.4 mm) was derived from the sensitivity analysis. The obtained Δ-error mean value was used for comparisons: 1. between different manufacturing processes; 2. between different manufacturing techniques in the same area of interest (AOI); and 3. between different AOI of the same group. RESULTS: The Δ-error mean value of each group ranged between -0.002 (Ti) and 0.041 (Co-Cr) mm. The Pearson's Chi-squared test revealed significant differences considering all groups paired two by two, except for group 3 and 4. The multiple comparison test documented a significant difference for each AOI among group 1, 3, and 4. The multiple comparison test showed significant differences among almost all different AOIs of each group. CONCLUSION: All Δ-mean error values of all digital protocols for manufacturing RPD frameworks optimally fit within the clinical tolerance limit of trueness and precision.
23
Aletta Hazeveld, James J.R. Huddleston Slater, Yijin Ren · American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics · 2013 · 360 citations