Frontiers in Oncology · 2023 · 14 citations · 32 references
MedicineOncologyRadiologyBiomedical ImagingDiagnostic ImagingDiagnostic RadiologyBreast Cancer ImagingBreast ImagingBreast Lesion CharacterizationDiffusion ImagingMagnetic Resonance ImagingMedical ImagingBreast Cancer Molecular SubtypesDiffusion Kurtosis ImagingDiffusion ModelsDiffusion Mri ModelingDiffusion-weighted ContrastIntravoxel Incoherent Motion ImagingPrognostic Factors AnalysisTumor Diffusion Imaging
Objective To investigate the correlations between quantitative diffusion parameters and prognostic factors and molecular subtypes of breast cancer, based on a single fast high-resolution diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) sequence with mono-exponential (Mono), intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM), diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) models. Materials and Methods A total of 143 patients with histopathologically verified breast cancer were included in this retrospective study. The multi-model DWI-derived parameters were quantitatively measured, including Mono-ADC, IVIM- D , IVIM- D* , IVIM- f , DKI-Dapp, and DKI-Kapp. In addition, the morphologic characteristics of the lesions (shape, margin, and internal signal characteristics) were visually assessed on DWI images. Next, Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, Mann-Whitney U test, Spearman’s rank correlation, logistic regression, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and Chi-squared test were utilized for statistical evaluations. Results The histogram metrics of Mono-ADC, IVIM- D , DKI-Dapp, and DKI-Kapp were significantly different between estrogen receptor (ER)-positive vs . ER-negative groups, progesterone receptor (PR)-positive vs . PR-negative groups, Luminal vs . non-Luminal subtypes, and human epidermal receptor factor-2 (HER2)-positive vs . non-HER2-positive subtypes. The histogram metrics of Mono-ADC, DKI-Dapp, and DKI-Kapp were also significantly different between triple-negative (TN) vs . non-TN subtypes. The ROC analysis revealed that the area under the curve considerably improved when the three diffusion models were combined compared with every single model, except for distinguishing lymph node metastasis (LNM) status. For the morphologic characteristics of the tumor, the margin showed substantial differences between ER-positive and ER-negative groups. Conclusions Quantitative multi-model analysis of DWI showed improved diagnostic performance for determining the prognostic factors and molecular subtypes of breast lesions. The morphologic characteristics obtained from high-resolution DWI can be identifying ER statuses of breast cancer.
32
Gene Young Cho, Linda Moy, Sungheon Kim et al. · European Radiology · 2015 · 152 citations · Full text
João V. Horvat, Blanca Bernard‐Davila, Thomas H. Helbich et al. · Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging · 2019 · 104 citations · Full text