Journal of Clinical Medicine · 2023 · 62 citations · 17 references
MedicineClinical SciencesInternal MedicineClinical MedicineInflammationPulmonologyAsthma ManagementAsthma PharmacotherapyPulmonary Function AssessmentRespiratory DiseaseRespiratory MedicineAdult-onset AsthmaAsthma Severity AssessmentBiologic Therapy For AsthmaClinical RemissionLong-term Asthma ManagementRemission MeasurementSevere Asthma ManagementSevere Asthma Treatment
Background: Recent advances in biologics have provided new insights into the clinical course of asthma, including disease modification, clinical remission (CR), and deep remission (DR). However, the extent to which biologics achieve CR and DR in severe asthma patients is poorly understood. Methods: To assess the achievement rate and predictors of CR and DR using long-term biologics, we retrospectively evaluated 54 severe asthma patients recently started on biologics. “CR” denotes the achievement of all three criteria: (1) absence of asthma symptoms, (2) no asthma exacerbations, and (3) no use of oral corticosteroids. DR denoted CR plus (4) normalized pulmonary function and (5) suppressed type 2 inflammation. Results: CR and DR achievement rates were 68.5% and 31.5%, respectively. Compared with the non-deep remission group, the DR group had higher adult-onset asthma rates (94.1% vs. 70.3%, p = 0.078), shorter asthma duration (5 vs. 19 years, p = 0.006), and higher FEV1 (91.5% vs. 71.5%, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in the Asthma Control Questionnaire scores, exacerbation frequency, or type 2 inflammation at baseline between groups. Asthma duration combined with FEV1 can stratify the achievement rates of CR and DR. Conclusions: the early introduction of biologics in severe asthma patients may help achieve CR and DR.
17
New Criteria for `Obesity Disease' in Japan
The Examination Committee of Criter · Circulation Journal · 2002 · 1.6K citations · Full text