Acta Pharmacologica Sinica · 2023 · 194 citations · 67 references
MedicineImmunologyOncologyCancer ImmunologyImmunotherapyMolecular OncologyCancer BiomarkersCancer ImmunotherapyCheckpoint Inhibitor TherapyImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsImmuno-oncology BiomarkersMolecular Tumor ProfilingImmune Checkpoint BiomarkersImmune Checkpoint Inhibitor BiomarkersImmune Checkpoint Inhibitor ResponseImmune Checkpoint Inhibitor TherapyImmunotherapy Response BiomarkersPredictive BiomarkersResponse To ImmunotherapyTranscriptomic Biomarkers
Immune-checkpoint inhibitors show promising effects in the treatment of multiple tumor types. Biomarkers are biological indicators used to select patients for a systemic anticancer treatment, but there are only a few clinically useful biomarkers such as PD-L1 expression and tumor mutational burden, which can be used to predict immunotherapy response. In this study, we established a database consisting of both gene expression and clinical data to identify biomarkers of response to anti-PD-1, anti-PD-L1, and anti-CTLA-4 immunotherapies. A GEO screening was executed to identify datasets with simultaneously available clinical response and transcriptomic data regardless of cancer type. The screening was restricted to the studies involving administration of anti-PD-1 (nivolumab, pembrolizumab), anti-PD-L1 (atezolizumab, durvalumab) or anti-CTLA-4 (ipilimumab) agents. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and Mann-Whitney test were executed across all genes to identify features related to therapy response. The database consisted of 1434 tumor tissue samples from 19 datasets with esophageal, gastric, head and neck, lung, and urothelial cancers, plus melanoma. The strongest druggable gene candidates linked to anti-PD-1 resistance were SPIN1 (AUC = 0.682, P = 9.1E-12), SRC (AUC = 0.667, P = 5.9E-10), SETD7 (AUC = 0.663, P = 1.0E-09), FGFR3 (AUC = 0.657, P = 3.7E-09), YAP1 (AUC = 0.655, P = 6.0E-09), TEAD3 (AUC = 0.649, P = 4.1E-08) and BCL2 (AUC = 0.634, P = 9.7E-08). In the anti-CTLA-4 treatment cohort, BLCAP (AUC = 0.735, P = 2.1E-06) was the most promising gene candidate. No therapeutically relevant target was found to be predictive in the anti-PD-L1 cohort. In the anti-PD-1 group, we were able to confirm the significant correlation with survival for the mismatch-repair genes MLH1 and MSH6. A web platform for further analysis and validation of new biomarker candidates was set up and available at https://www.rocplot.com/immune . In summary, a database and a web platform were established to investigate biomarkers of immunotherapy response in a large cohort of solid tumor samples. Our results could help to identify new patient cohorts eligible for immunotherapy.
67
Improved Survival with Ipilimumab in Patients with Metastatic Melanoma
F. Stephen Hodi, Steven O’Day, David F. McDermott et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2010 · 15.2K citations · Full text
NCBI GEO: archive for functional genomics data sets—update
Tanya Barrett, Stephen E. Wilhite, Pierre Ledoux et al. · Nucleic Acids Research · 2012 · 10.8K citations · Full text
Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Richard S. Finn, Shukui Qin, Masafumi Ikeda et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2020 · 7.2K citations · Full text
Medicine, Oncology, Pharmacotherapy +12
TGFβ attenuates tumour response to PD-L1 blockade by contributing to exclusion of T cells
Sanjeev Mariathasan, Shannon J. Turley, Dorothee Nickles et al. · Nature · 2018 · 5.5K citations
Life Sciences, Immunology, Oncology +16