International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care · 2023 · 13 citations · 11 references
PharmacyHealth PolicyPharmaceutical PolicyHealth Technology AssessmentPharmaceutical RegulationStakeholder EngagementHealth Authority InteractionsHealthcare Stakeholder EngagementPharmaceutical GovernanceRegulatory EngagementRegulatory StrategyStakeholder AnalysisMulti-stakeholder CollaborationMulti-stakeholder EngagementMulti-stakeholder MappingMulti-stakeholder OrganizationsMulti-stakeholder ProcessesPatient Access BarriersPrioritizationRegulatory Interaction Assessment
BACKGROUND: Multi-stakeholder interactions have evolved at product and policy levels. There is a need to assess the current and future landscape of interactions between companies, and regulatory and HTA agencies to address challenges and identify areas for improvement. OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to review the current interactions within and across regulatory and HTA agencies, and companies' experiences in engaging in these activities; to assess the added value of interactions as well as limitations; to explore the future ecosystem for stakeholder interactions. METHOD: Three separate questionnaires were developed for companies, regulators and HTA agencies, respectively, to assess their experiences and perceptions. The responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics and discussed at a multi-stakeholder workshop. Key outcomes from the surveys and workshop discussion were reported. RESULTS: All seven regulators and seven HTA agencies in the survey indicated that they had stakeholder interactions. More formal collaboration occurred with regulators compared with HTA agencies. All nine companies have taken early advice but indicated the need for future prioritization. Success indicators can be built at the product and therapy levels, with the added value of faster patient access. Four principles were proposed for the future ecosystem: separate remit and functions between regulators and HTA; align processes; converge evidence requirements where possible; increase transparency. CONCLUSIONS: This research brought together regulators, HTA agencies, companies to examine how they interact with one another. We propose measures of value and make recommendations on future evolution to enable better evidence generation and improve regulatory and HTA decision-making.
11
Giovanni Tafuri, Margherita Pagnini, Jane Moseley et al. · British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology · 2016 · 64 citations · Full text
Giovanni Tafuri, Inês Lucas, Steve Estevão et al. · British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology · 2018 · 38 citations · Full text
Camilla Palmhøj Nielsen, Sarah Wadmann Lauritsen, Finn Børlum Kristensen et al. · International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care · 2009 · 37 citations · Full text
HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE HTAsiaLINK NETWORK AND ITS KEY DETERMINANTS OF SUCCESS
Yot Teerawattananon, Karlena Luz, Chalarntorn Yothasmutra et al. · International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care · 2018 · 30 citations · Full text
Public Affairs, Health Policy, Health Services Administration +17