Motion-Tracking Brillouin Microscopy Evaluation of Normal, Keratoconic, and Post–Laser Vision Correction Corneas

Abstract

PurposeTo characterize focal biomechanical differences between normal, keratoconic, and post–laser vision correction (LVC) corneas using motion-tracking Brillouin microscopy.DesignProspective cross-sectional study.MethodsThirty eyes from 30 patients (10 normal controls [Controls], 10 post-LVC, and 10 stage I or II keratoconus [KC]) had Scheimpflug and motion-tracking Brillouin microscopy imaging using a custom-built device. Mean, maximum (max) and minimum (min) Brillouin shift, spatial standard deviation, and max-min values were compared. Min values were correlated with local Brillouin values at multiple Scheimpflug imaging locations.ResultsMean (P < .0003), min (P < .00001), spatial standard deviation (P < .01), and max-min (P < .001) were significantly different between the groups. In post hoc pairwise comparisons, the best differentiators for group comparisons were mean (P = .0004) and min (P = .000002) for Controls vs KC, min (P = .0022) and max-min (P = .002) for Controls vs LVC, and mean (P = .0037) and min (P = .0043) for LVC vs KC. Min (area under the receiver operating characteristic = 1.0) and mean (area under the receiver operating characteristic = 0.96) performed well in differentiating Control and KC eyes. Min values correlated best with Brillouin shift values at the thinnest corneal point (r2 = 0.871, P = .001) and maximum keratometry value identified in the tangential curvature map (r2 = 0.840, P = .002).ConclusionsMotion-tracking Brillouin microscopy effectively characterized focal corneal biomechanical alterations in LVC and KC and clearly differentiated these groups from Controls. Primary motion-tracking Brillouin metrics performed well in differentiating groups as compared with basic Scheimpflug metrics, in contrast to previous Brillouin studies, and identified focal changes after LVC where prior Brillouin studies did not. To characterize focal biomechanical differences between normal, keratoconic, and post–laser vision correction (LVC) corneas using motion-tracking Brillouin microscopy. Prospective cross-sectional study. Thirty eyes from 30 patients (10 normal controls [Controls], 10 post-LVC, and 10 stage I or II keratoconus [KC]) had Scheimpflug and motion-tracking Brillouin microscopy imaging using a custom-built device. Mean, maximum (max) and minimum (min) Brillouin shift, spatial standard deviation, and max-min values were compared. Min values were correlated with local Brillouin values at multiple Scheimpflug imaging locations. Mean (P < .0003), min (P < .00001), spatial standard deviation (P < .01), and max-min (P < .001) were significantly different between the groups. In post hoc pairwise comparisons, the best differentiators for group comparisons were mean (P = .0004) and min (P = .000002) for Controls vs KC, min (P = .0022) and max-min (P = .002) for Controls vs LVC, and mean (P = .0037) and min (P = .0043) for LVC vs KC. Min (area under the receiver operating characteristic = 1.0) and mean (area under the receiver operating characteristic = 0.96) performed well in differentiating Control and KC eyes. Min values correlated best with Brillouin shift values at the thinnest corneal point (r2 = 0.871, P = .001) and maximum keratometry value identified in the tangential curvature map (r2 = 0.840, P = .002). Motion-tracking Brillouin microscopy effectively characterized focal corneal biomechanical alterations in LVC and KC and clearly differentiated these groups from Controls. Primary motion-tracking Brillouin metrics performed well in differentiating groups as compared with basic Scheimpflug metrics, in contrast to previous Brillouin studies, and identified focal changes after LVC where prior Brillouin studies did not.