Security and Privacy · 2023 · 26 citations · 97 references
ComputingComputer ScienceInformation TechnologyInternet Of ThingsNetwork SecuritySecurity ProtocolsIot ArchitectureIot Communication ProtocolsIot PrivacyIot SecuritySensor NetworksSmart ContractsBandwidthBlockchain ConsensusBlockchain-based Data SecurityBlockchain-based Data SharingConsensusData ConsistencySecurity In Internet Of Things NetworksSensor Nodes
Abstract Recently, Internet‐of‐Things (IoT) based applications have shifted from centralized infrastructures to decentralized ecosystems, owing to user data's security and privacy limitations. The shift has opened new doors for intruders to launch distributed attacks in diverse IoT scenarios that jeopardize the application environments. Moreover, as heterogeneous and autonomous networks communicate, the attacks intensify, which justifies the requirement of trust as a key policy. Recently, blockchain‐based IoT solutions have been proposed that address trust limitations by maintaining data consistency, immutability, and chronology in IoT environments. However, IoT ecosystems are resource‐constrained and have low bandwidth and finite computing power of sensor nodes. Thus, the inclusion of blockchain requires an effective policy design regarding consensus and smart contract environments in heterogeneous IoT applications. Recent studies have presented blockchain as a potential solution in IoT, but an effective view of consensus and smart contract design to meet the end application requirements is an open problem. Motivated by the same, the survey presents the integration of suitable low‐powered consensus protocols and smart contract design to assess and validate the blockchain‐IoT ecosystems. We present blockchain‐IoT's emerging communication and security aspects with performance issues of consensus protocols, interoperability, and implementation platforms. A case study of a smart contract‐based blockchain‐driven ecosystem is presented with a comparative analysis of mining cost and latency, which shows its suitability in real‐world setups. We also highlight attacks on blockchain IoT, open issues, potential findings, and future directions. The survey intends to drive novel solutions for future consensus and safe, smart contract designs to support applicative IoT ecosystems.
97
Making Smart Contracts Smarter
Loi Luu, Duc-Hiep Chu, Hrishi Olickel et al. · 2016 · 2.2K citations
Security, privacy and trust in Internet of Things: The road ahead
Sabrina Sicari, Alessandra Rizzardi, Luigi Alfredo Grieco et al. · Computer Networks · 2014 · 2.1K citations
On blockchain and its integration with IoT. Challenges and opportunities
Ana Reyna, Cristian Martín, Jaime Chen et al. · Future Generation Computer Systems · 2018 · 1.9K citations · Full text
Blockchain for IoT security and privacy: The case study of a smart home
Ali Dorri, Salil S. Kanhere, Raja Jurdak et al. · 2017 · 1.8K citations