Cardiovascular Diabetology · 2023 · 33 citations · 25 references
MedicineCardiologyPharmacologyCardiovascular PharmacotherapyClinical PharmacologyMolecular PharmacologyDiabetes MellitusGlucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor AgonistsHeart FailureIncretin-based TherapiesLipid-lowering TherapySodium-glucose Cotransporter 2 InhibitorsGlucagon-like Peptide 1 Receptor AgonismGlucose-lowering TherapyMedicare Fee-for-serviceSmall-molecule Glp-1 Receptor AgonistsSodium-glucose CotransportSodium-glucose Cotransporter 2 InhibitionType 2 Diabetes PharmacotherapyType 2 Diabetes Treatment
BACKGROUND: No study has compared the cardiovascular outcomes for sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) head-to-head against other glucose-lowering therapies, including dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor (DDP4i) or glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA)-which also have cardiovascular benefits-in patients with heart failure with reduced (HFrEF) or preserved (HFpEF) ejection fraction. METHODS: Medicare fee-for-service data (2013-2019) were used to create four pair-wise comparison cohorts of type 2 diabetes patients with: (1a) HFrEF initiating SGLT2i versus DPP4i; (1b) HFrEF initiating SGLT2i versus GLP-1RA; (2a) HFpEF initiating SGLT2i versus DPP4i; and (2b) HFpEF initiating SGLT2i versus GLP-1RA. The primary outcomes were (1) hospitalization for heart failure (HHF) and (2) myocardial infarction (MI) or stroke hospitalizations. Adjusted hazards ratios (HR) and 95% CIs were estimated using inverse probability of treatment weighting. RESULTS: Among HFrEF patients, initiation of SGLT2i versus DPP4i (cohort 1a; n = 13,882) was associated with a lower risk of HHF (adjusted Hazard Ratio [HR (95% confidence interval)], 0.67 (0.63, 0.72) and MI or stroke (HR: 0.86 [0.75, 0.99]), and initiation of SGLT2i versus GLP-1RA (cohort 1b; n = 6951) was associated with lower risk of HHF (HR: 0.86 [0.79, 0.93]), but not MI or stroke (HR: 1.02 [0.85, 1.22]). Among HFpEF patients, initiation of SGLT2i versus DPP4i (cohort 2a; n = 17,493) was associated with lower risk of HHF (HR: 0.65 [0.61, 0.69]) but not MI or stroke (HR: 0.90 [0.79, 1.02]), and initiation of SGLT2i versus GLP-1RA (cohort 2b; n = 9053) was associated with lower risk of HHF (0.89 [0.83, 0.96]), but not MI or stroke (HR: 0.97 [0.83, 1.14]). Results were robust across range of secondary outcomes (e.g., all-cause mortality) and sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Bias from residual confounding cannot be ruled out. Use of SGLT2i was associated with reduced risk of HHF against DPP4i and GLP-1RA, reduced risk of MI or stroke against DPP4i within the HFrEF subgroup, and comparable risk of MI or stroke against GLP-1RA. Notably, the magnitude of cardiovascular benefit conferred by SGLT2i was similar among patients with HFrEF and HFpEF.
25
Canagliflozin and Cardiovascular and Renal Events in Type 2 Diabetes
Bruce Neal, Vlado Perkovic, Kenneth W. Mahaffey et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2017 · 7.8K citations · Full text
Dapagliflozin and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes
Stephen D. Wiviott, Itamar Raz, Marc P. Bonaca et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2018 · 6.3K citations · Full text
Empagliflozin in Heart Failure with a Preserved Ejection Fraction
Stefan D. Anker, Javed Butler, Gerasimos Filippatos et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2021 · 4.6K citations · Full text
Medicine, Cardiology, Pharmacology +14