Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · 2023 · 32 citations · 29 references
MedicineNeuroscienceNeural EngineeringSleep MedicineSleep NeurologyNeurostimulationSleep DisturbanceSleep HealthSleep ManagementSleep PhysiologyElectrical StimulationSleepSleep QualitySleep Quality AssessmentSubjective Sleep QualityTranscranial Alternating Current StimulationTranscranial Electrical Stimulation
Insufficient sleep is a major health issue. Inadequate sleep is associated with an array of poor health outcomes, including cardiovascular disease, diabetes, obesity, certain forms of cancer, Alzheimer’s disease, depression, anxiety, and suicidality. Given concerns with typical sedative hypnotic drugs for treating sleep difficulties, there is a compelling need for alternative interventions. Here, we report results of a non-invasive electrical brain stimulation approach to optimizing sleep involving transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS). A total of 25 participants (mean age: 46.3, S.D. ± 12.4, 15 females) were recruited for a null-stimulation controlled (Control condition), within subjects, randomized crossed design, that included two variants of an active condition involving 15 min pre-sleep tACS stimulation. To evaluate the impact on sleep quality, the two active tACS stimulation conditions were designed to modulate sleep-dependent neural activity in the theta/alpha frequency bands, with both stimulation types applied to all subjects in separate sessions. The first tACS condition used a fixed stimulation pattern across all participants, a pattern composed of stimulation at 5 and 10 Hz. The second tACS condition used a personalized stimulation approach with the stimulation frequencies determined by each individual’s peak EEG frequencies in the 4–6 Hz and 9–11 Hz bands. Personalized tACS stimulation increased sleep quantity (duration) by 22 min compared to a Control condition ( p = 0.04), and 19 min compared to Fixed tACS stimulation ( p = 0.03). Fixed stimulation did not significantly increase sleep duration compared to Control (mean: 3 min; p = 0.75). For sleep onset, the Personalized tACS stimulation resulted in reducing the onset by 28% compared to the Fixed tACS stimulation (6 min faster, p = 0.02). For a Poor Sleep sub-group ( n = 13) categorized with Clinical Insomnia and a high insomnia severity, Personalized tACS stimulation improved sleep duration by 33 min compared to Fixed stimulation ( p = 0.02), and 30 min compared to Control condition ( p < 0.1). Together, these results suggest that Personalized stimulation improves sleep quantity and time taken to fall asleep relative to Control and Fixed stimulation providing motivation for larger-scale trials for Personalized tACS as a sleep therapeutic, including for those with insomnia.
29
High Gamma Power Is Phase-Locked to Theta Oscillations in Human Neocortex
Ryan T. Canolty, E. Edwards, Sarang S. Dalal et al. · Science · 2006 · 2.8K citations · Full text
Parameterizing neural power spectra into periodic and aperiodic components
Thomas Donoghue, Matar Haller, Erik Peterson et al. · Nature Neuroscience · 2020 · 2.4K citations · Full text
Insomnia: Definition, Prevalence, Etiology, and Consequences
Thomas Roth · Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine · 2007 · 1.5K citations
Medicine, Psychiatry, Psychology +10
Auditory Closed-Loop Stimulation of the Sleep Slow Oscillation Enhances Memory
Hong‐Viet V. Ngo, Thomas Martinetz, Jan Born et al. · Neuron · 2013 · 909 citations · Full text