Remote Sensing · 2022 · 19 citations · 64 references
Natural SciencesEarth SciencesPhysical GeographyClimate ScienceClimatologySnow HydrologyCrop PhenologyPhenology MonitoringRemote Sensing Change DetectionVegetation Change DetectionVegetation IndicesVegetation MonitoringPhenological IndicatorsPhenological Vegetation IndicesPhenology Trend AnalysisRemote Sensing AnalysisRemote Sensing Of PhenologyRemote Sensing Phenology ModelingVegetation Phenology MonitoringVegetation Trend Analysis
The phenological parameters estimated from different data may vary, especially in response to climatic factors. Therefore, we estimated the start of the growing season (SOS) and the end of the growing season (EOS) based on sunlight-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF), the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and the near-infrared reflectance of vegetation (NIRv). The SIF, NDVI and NIRv breakpoints were detected, and the trends and change-points of phenological parameters based on these data were analyzed. The correlations between the phenological parameters and snow-related factors, precipitation, temperature, soil moisture and population density were also analyzed. The results showed that SIF and NIRv could identify breakpoints early. SIF could estimate the latest SOS and the earliest EOS. NDVI could estimate the earliest SOS and the latest EOS. The change-points of SOSSIF were mostly concentrated from 2001 to 2003, and those of SOSNDVI and SOSNIRv occurred later. The change-points of EOSSIF and EOSNIRv were mostly concentrated from 2001 to 2007, and those of EOSSIF occurred later. Differently from the weak correlation with SOSSIF, SOSNDVI and SOSNIRv were significantly correlated with snow-related factors. The correlation between the meteorological factors in the summer and autumn and EOSSIF was the most significant. The population density showed the highest degree of interpretation for SOSNIRv and EOSNDVI. The results reveal the differences and potentials of different remote-sensing parameters in estimating phenological indicators, which is helpful for better understanding the dynamic changes in phenology and the response to changes in various influencing factors.
64
Jinfeng Wang, Xin‐Hu Li, George Christakos et al. · International Journal of Geographical Information Systems · 2010 · 2.6K citations
Monitoring vegetation phenology using MODIS
Xiaoyang Zhang, M. A. Friedl, Crystal Schaaf et al. · Remote Sensing of Environment · 2003 · 2.5K citations
Roy C. Geary, M. G. Kendall · The Economic Journal · 1949 · 2.4K citations