Journal of Prosthodontics · 2022 · 25 citations · 22 references
No significant differences were observed among the ΔE<sub>00</sub> values of tested materials (df = 2, F = 2.933, p = 0.070). RTP values were only affected by material type (p < 0.001) as AM had the highest RTP (p < 0.001), whereas IN and EX had similar values (p ≥ 0.165). BFS values varied among tested materials (df = 2, F = 21.341, p < 0.001). AM and EX had similar BFS values (p = 0.067) that were higher than that of IN (p ≤ 0.001). Weibull moduli of the materials were similar (p = 0.305), whereas EX had the highest and IN had the lowest characteristic strength values (p < 0.001) CONCLUSIONS: Although nano-lithium disilicate had the highest translucency, all materials had imperceptible color and translucency changes after thermal cycling when reported threshold values were considered. Newly introduced lithium disilicate glass-ceramics had adequate flexural strength as compared to the precursor material.
22
Color Difference Thresholds in Dentistry
Rade D. Paravina, Razvan Ghinea, Luis Javier Herrera et al. · Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry · 2015 · 1.2K citations
Massimiliano Guazzato, Mohammad Albakry, Simon P. Ringer et al. · Dental Materials · 2003 · 455 citations
Translucency thresholds for dental materials
Marianne Salas, Cristina Lucena, Luis Javier Herrera et al. · Dental Materials · 2018 · 265 citations