BMJ Military Health · 2022 · 10 citations · 23 references
MedicineCardiologyInternal MedicineExercise TestingPhysical ExaminationPulmonary Function TestingCardiopulmonary Exercise TestingExercise AssessmentExercise Test InterpretationPhysical FitnessPhysical Fitness AssessmentCardiac Functional CapacityCardiopulmonary Exercise Testing InterpretationCardiopulmonary FitnessCardiovascular Fitness TestingCardiovascular Symptom AssessmentExercise Test Prognostic StratificationFunctional Capacity DeclineHealth Anxiety Assessment
Objective Post-COVID-19 syndrome presents a health and economic challenge affecting ~10% of patients recovering from COVID-19. Accurate assessment of patients with post-COVID-19 syndrome is complicated by health anxiety and coincident symptomatic autonomic dysfunction. We sought to determine whether either symptoms or objective cardiopulmonary exercise testing could predict clinically significant findings. Methods 113 consecutive military patients were assessed in a comprehensive clinical pathway. This included symptom reporting, history, examination, spirometry, echocardiography and cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) in all, with chest CT, dual-energy CT pulmonary angiography and cardiac MRI where indicated. Symptoms, CPET findings and presence/absence of significant pathology were reviewed. Data were analysed to identify diagnostic strategies that may be used to exclude significant disease. Results 7/113 (6%) patients had clinically significant disease adjudicated by cardiothoracic multidisciplinary team (MDT). These patients had reduced fitness (V̇O 2 26.7 (±5.1) vs 34.6 (±7.0) mL/kg/min; p=0.002) and functional capacity (peak power 200 (±36) vs 247 (±55) W; p=0.026) compared with those without significant disease. Simple CPET criteria (oxygen uptake (V̇O 2 ) >100% predicted and minute ventilation (VE)/carbon dioxide elimination (V̇CO 2 ) slope <30.0 or VE/V̇CO 2 slope <35.0 in isolation) excluded significant disease with sensitivity and specificity of 86% and 83%, respectively (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) 0.89). The addition of capillary blood gases to estimate alveolar–arterial gradient improved diagnostic performance to 100% sensitivity and 78% specificity (AUC 0.92). Symptoms and spirometry did not discriminate significant disease. Conclusions In a population recovering from SARS-CoV-2, there is reassuringly little organ pathology. CPET and functional capacity testing, but not reported symptoms, permit the exclusion of clinically significant disease.
23
Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China
Chaolin Huang, Yeming Wang, Xingwang Li et al. · The Lancet · 2020 · 51.8K citations · Full text
A Brief Measure for Assessing Generalized Anxiety Disorder
Robert L. Spitzer, Kurt Kroenke, Janet B. W. Williams et al. · Archives of Internal Medicine · 2006 · 31.5K citations
Nursing, Psychiatry, Psychology +17
John G.F. Cleland, Andrew J.S. Coats, Ewa A. Jankowska et al. · PubMed · 2021 · 19.5K citations
Exercise Capacity and Mortality among Men Referred for Exercise Testing
Jonathan Myers, Manish Prakash, Victor F. Froelicher et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2002 · 4.1K citations · Full text
Education, Physiology, Aging +16