International Journal of Cardiology · 2022 · 10 citations · 17 references
MedicineCardiologyInternal MedicineCardiothoracic SurgeryClinical CardiologyInterventional CardiologyAcute Coronary Syndrome InterventionCardiac CatheterizationCoronary AngioplastyCoronary Artery DiseaseIschemic Heart DiseaseMyocardial Blood Flow QuantificationClinical Outcome MeasurementCoronary Flow Reserve AssessmentIschemic Risk StratificationMyocardial Flow ReserveMyocardial Infarction Risk StratificationNon-st-elevation Myocardial InfarctionPrimary Outcome AnalysisReclassification
BACKGROUND: Complete revascularization in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial (STEMI) improves clinical outcome. Vessel fractional flow reserve (vFFR) has been validated as a non-invasive physiological technology to evaluate hemodynamic lesion significance without need for a dedicated pressure wire or hyperemic agent. This study aimed to assess discordance between vFFR reclassification and treatment strategy in intermediate non-culprit lesions of STEMI patients and to assess the clinical impact of this discordance. METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study. From January 2018 to December 2019, consecutive eligible STEMI patients were screened based on the presence of a non-culprit vessel with an intermediate lesion (30-80% angiographic stenosis) feasible for offline vFFR analysis. The primary outcome was the percentage of non-culprit vessels with discordance between vFFR and actual treatment strategy. The secondary outcome was two-year vessel-oriented composite endpoint (VOCE), a composite of vessel-related cardiovascular death, vessel-related myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization. RESULTS: A total of 441 patients (598 non-culprit vessels) met the inclusion criteria. Median vFFR was 0.85 (0.73-0.91). Revascularization was performed in 34.4% of vessels. Discordance between vFFR and actual treatment strategy occurred in 126 (21.1%) vessels. Freedom from VOCE was higher for concordant vessels (97.5%) as compared to discordant vessels (90.6%)(p = 0.003), particularly due to higher adverse event rates in discordant vessels with a vFFR ≤0.80 but deferred revascularization. CONCLUSIONS: In STEMI patients with multivessel disease, discordance between vFFR reclassification and treatment strategy was observed in 21.1% of non-culprit vessels with an intermediate lesion and was associated with increased vessel-related adverse events.
17
Randomized Trial of Preventive Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction
David S Wald, Joan K. Morris, Nicholas Wald et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2013 · 1K citations · Full text
Thomas Engstrøm, Henning Kelbæk, Steffen Helqvist et al. · The Lancet · 2015 · 966 citations
Complete Revascularization with Multivessel PCI for Myocardial Infarction
Shamir R. Mehta, David Wood, Robert F. Storey et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2019 · 913 citations · Full text
Medicine, Cardiology, Surgery +15