Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · 2022 · 101 citations · 37 references
ComputingHealth InformaticsOncologyArtificial IntelligenceClinical Decision SupportHealthcare Information SystemsDecision Support In HealthcareDigital Twin DesignDigital Twin ApplicationsDigital Twin ArchitectureDigital Twin DevelopmentDigital Twin IntegrationDigital Twin ModelingDigital TwinsHeterogeneous Data FusionTreatment Decision-making Support
Abstract Digital twins, succinctly described as the digital representation of a physical object, is a concept that has emerged relatively recently with increasing application in the manufacturing industry. This article proposes the application of this concept to the healthcare domain to provide enhanced clinical decision support and enable more patient‐centric, and simultaneously more precise and individualized care to ensue. Digital twins combined with advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI) have the potential to facilitate the integration and processing of vast amounts of heterogeneous data stemming from diversified sources. Hence, in healthcare this can provide enhanced diagnosis and treatment decision support. In applying digital twins in combination with AI to complex healthcare contexts to assist clinical decision making, it is also likely that a key current challenge in healthcare; namely, providing better quality care which is of high value and can lead to better clinical outcomes and a higher level of patient satisfaction, can ensue. In this focus article, we address this proposition by focusing on the case study of cancer care and present our conceptualization of a digital twin model combined with AI to address key, current limitations in endometrial cancer treatment. We highlight the role of AI techniques in developing digital twins for cancer care and simultaneously identify key barriers and facilitators of this process from both a healthcare and technology perspective. This article is categorized under: Application Areas > Health Care
37
Rebecca L. Siegel, Kimberly D. Miller, Ahmedin Jemal · CA A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · 2019 · 21K citations · Full text
Rebecca L. Siegel, Kimberly D. Miller, Hannah E. Fuchs et al. · CA A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · 2021 · 17.4K citations · Full text
SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2003
Lynn A. G. Ries, D. Harkins, Martin Krapcho et al. · ScholarWorks - Georgia State University (Georgia State University) · 2006 · 11.5K citations · Full text
Medicine, Biostatistics, Oncology +12
Digital Twin: Enabling Technologies, Challenges and Open Research
Aidan Fuller, Zhong Fan, Charles Day et al. · IEEE Access · 2020 · 2.5K citations · Full text
Engineering, Manufacturing Engineering, Artificial Intelligence +14
Real-World Evidence — What Is It and What Can It Tell Us?
Rachel E. Sherman, Steven A. Anderson, Gerald J. Dal Pan et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2016 · 2.1K citations