Publication | Open Access
Blue, green, and turquoise pathways for minimizing hydrogen production costs from steam methane reforming with CO2 capture
84
Citations
17
References
2022
Year
Hydrogen ProductionGas ConversionEngineeringEnergy ConversionClimate Change AmbitionsGreen HydrogenChemistryHydrogen GenerationChemical EngineeringSteam MethaneClean ElectricityEnergy ApplicationsTurquoise PathwaysHydrogen Production CostsHydrogen UtilizationEnergy ProductionHydrogen Production TechnologyHydrogenGas ProductionSustainable EnergySmr Process ConfigurationsCarbon Utilization
Rising climate change ambitions require large-scale clean hydrogen production in the near term. “Blue” hydrogen from conventional steam methane reforming (SMR) with pre-combustion CO2 capture can fulfil this role. This study therefore presents techno-economic assessments of a range of SMR process configurations to minimize hydrogen production costs. Results showed that pre-combustion capture can avoid up to 80% of CO2 emissions cheaply at 35 €/ton, but the final 20% of CO2 capture is much more expensive at a marginal CO2 avoidance cost around 150 €/ton. Thus, post-combustion CO2 capture should be a better solution for avoiding the final 20% of CO2. Furthermore, an advanced heat integration scheme that recovers most of the steam condensation enthalpy before the CO2 capture unit can reduce hydrogen production costs by about 6%. Two hybrid hydrogen production options were also assessed. First, a “blue-green” hydrogen plant that uses clean electricity to heat the reformer achieved similar hydrogen production costs to the pure blue configuration. Second, a “blue-turquoise” configuration that replaces the pre-reformer with molten salt pyrolysis for converting higher hydrocarbons to a pure carbon product can significantly reduce costs if carbon has a similar value to hydrogen. In conclusion, conventional pre-combustion CO2 capture from SMR is confirmed as a good solution for kickstarting the hydrogen economy, and it can be tailored to various market conditions with respect to CO2, electricity, and pure carbon prices.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1