Big Data and Cognitive Computing · 2022 · 222 citations · 94 references
ComputingComputer SciencePhysicsArtificial IntelligenceComputational PhysicsMachine LearningDeep LearningNeural NetworksJournal LiteratureLoss Reduction TechniquesNeural Network ModelingNeural Network PredictionPhysics-informed ModelingResearch ArticlesSystematic Literature Review
This research aims to study and assess state-of-the-art physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) from different researchers’ perspectives. The PRISMA framework was used for a systematic literature review, and 120 research articles from the computational sciences and engineering domain were specifically classified through a well-defined keyword search in Scopus and Web of Science databases. Through bibliometric analyses, we have identified journal sources with the most publications, authors with high citations, and countries with many publications on PINNs. Some newly improved techniques developed to enhance PINN performance and reduce high training costs and slowness, among other limitations, have been highlighted. Different approaches have been introduced to overcome the limitations of PINNs. In this review, we categorized the newly proposed PINN methods into Extended PINNs, Hybrid PINNs, and Minimized Loss techniques. Various potential future research directions are outlined based on the limitations of the proposed solutions.
94
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
Matthew J. Page, Joanne E. McKenzie, Patrick M. Bossuyt et al. · BMJ · 2021 · 95K citations · Full text
Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators
Kurt Hornik, Maxwell B. Stinchcombe, Halbert White · Neural Networks · 1989 · 21.2K citations
Maziar Raissi, Paris Perdikaris, George Em Karniadakis · Journal of Computational Physics · 2018 · 16.9K citations · Full text