PharmacoEconomics · 2022 · 64 citations · 43 references
PharmacyHealth PolicyHealth AssessmentHealth EconomicsHealth Technology AssessmentDiscrete Choice ModelsHealth State UtilitiesHealth State ValuationHealth-state Utility MeasurementSampling MethodsStated Preference MethodsHealth Outcome ValuationHealth State Utility EstimationHealth Utility ValuationImportance MeasuresPatient-reported Utility MeasurementPreference-based Health State ValuationQaly CalculationValue Set Development
INTRODUCTION: The standard EQ-5D-Y-3L valuation protocol applies DCE data as the primary preference source to model the relative importance of dimensions while cTTO data served to anchor the DCE coefficients onto the QALY scale. This study aims to estimate an EQ-5D-Y-3L value set for China following this protocol, but with a larger cTTO design to better understand the role of cTTO data in estimating EQ-5D-Y-3L value sets. METHODS: In total, 150 choice sets and 28 EQ-5D-Y-3L health states were valued using DCE and cTTO methods with two independent samples, respectively. General public from 14 different regions were recruited using quota sampling method to achieve representativeness. We compared two modelling strategies: (1) fit the DCE data with mixed logit model with correlated coefficients and a subsequent mapping procedure for anchoring; (2) fit the DCE and TTO data jointly in a hybrid model. Two evaluation criteria (1) coefficient significance and monotonicity; (2) prediction accuracy of the observed cTTO values were used to select the value set. RESULTS: In total, 1476 individuals participated in the study, with 1058 participated the DCE interview and 418 participated the cTTO interview. The highest mean TTO value was 0.924 for state 11112 and the lowest mean TTO value was - 0.088 for state 33333. The hybrid model with an A3 term performed the best and was selected as the value set. DISCUSSION: Following the international protocol and using a larger cTTO design, this study established the EQ-5D-Y-3L value set using a hybrid model for China. Future EQ-5D-Y-3L valuation study could consider using a larger cTTO design for estimating the value set.
43
Dutch Tariff for the Five-Level Version of EQ-5D
Matthijs Versteegh, Karin M. Vermeulen, Silvia Evers et al. · Value in Health · 2016 · 1.1K citations · Full text
Development of the EQ-5D-Y: a child-friendly version of the EQ-5D
Nora Wille, Gouke J. Bonsel, Kristina Burström et al. · Quality of Life Research · 2010 · 896 citations · Full text
Estimating an EQ-5D-5L Value Set for China
Nan Luo, Gordon Liu, LI Ming-hui et al. · Value in Health · 2017 · 725 citations · Full text
Chinese Time Trade-Off Values for EQ-5D Health States
Gordon G. Liu, Hongyan Wu, Minghui Li et al. · Value in Health · 2014 · 388 citations · Full text