Journal of Clinical Oncology · 2022 · 34 citations · 40 references
MedicineGeriatric MedicineOncologyGeriatric AssessmentGeriatric CareGeriatricsComprehensive Geriatric AssessmentGeriatric Cancer AssessmentGeriatric OncologyPalliative Care In Older AdultsToxicity GradingToxicity ManagementClinicaltrials.gov RegistrationGeriatric Assessment ToolsGeriatric Comprehensive AssessmentGeriatric Symptom AssessmentGeriatric Toxicity AssessmentOlder Adult AssessmentPatient-reported Toxicity GradingSerious Adverse Events
PURPOSE Providing a geriatric assessment (GA) summary with management recommendations to oncologists reduces clinician-rated toxicity in older patients with advanced cancer receiving treatment. This secondary analysis of a national cluster randomized clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02054741 ) aims to assess the effects of a GA intervention on symptomatic toxicity measured by Patient-Reported Outcomes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE). METHODS From 2014 to 2019, the study enrolled patients age ≥ 70 years, with advanced solid tumors or lymphoma and ≥ 1 GA domain impairment, who were initiating a regimen with high prevalence of toxicity. Patients completed PRO-CTCAEs, including the severity of 24 symptoms (11 classified as core symptoms) at enrollment, 4-6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months. Symptoms were scored as grade ≥ 2 (at least moderate) and grade ≥ 3 (severe/very severe). Symptomatic toxicity was determined by an increase in severity during treatment. A generalized estimating equation model was used to assess the effects of the GA intervention on symptomatic toxicity. RESULTS Mean age was 77 years (range, 70-96 years), 43% were female, and 88% were White, 59% had GI or lung cancers, and 27% received prior chemotherapy. In 706 patients who provided PRO-CTCAEs at baseline, 86.1% reported at least one moderate symptom and 49.7% reported severe/very severe symptoms at regimen initiation. In 623 patients with follow-up PRO-CTCAE data, compared with usual care, fewer patients in the GA intervention arm reported grade ≥ 2 symptomatic toxicity (overall: 88.9% v 94.8%, P = .035; core symptoms: 83.4% v 91.7%, P = .001). The results for grade ≥ 3 toxicity were comparable but not significant ( P > .05). CONCLUSION In the presence of a high baseline symptom burden, a GA intervention for older patients with advanced cancer reduces patient-reported symptomatic toxicity.
40
Rebecca L. Siegel, Kimberly D. Miller, Ahmedin Jemal · CA A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · 2020 · 21.4K citations · Full text
Future of Cancer Incidence in the United States: Burdens Upon an Aging, Changing Nation
Benjamin D. Smith, Grace L. Smith, Arti Hurria et al. · Journal of Clinical Oncology · 2009 · 1.7K citations · Full text
Medicine, Demography, Oncology +17
Supriya G. Mohile, William Dale, Mark R. Somerfield et al. · Journal of Clinical Oncology · 2018 · 1.4K citations · Full text
João Paulo Consentino Solano, Bárbara Gomes, Irene J Higginson · Journal of Pain and Symptom Management · 2006 · 1.2K citations · Full text
Medicine, Cardiology, Oncology +17