JHEP Reports · 2022 · 61 citations · 13 references
MedicineImmunologyOncologyCancer ImmunologyImmunotherapyMolecular OncologyCancer ImmunotherapyCheckpoint Inhibitor TherapyHepatocellular CarcinomaImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsImmune CheckpointsImmunotherapy SafetyCheckpoint Antagonist TherapyHepatocellular Carcinoma TreatmentImmune Checkpoint Inhibitor ResponseImmune Checkpoint Inhibitor TherapyRechallenge Responses
Background & Aims: We investigated the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) rechallenge in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who received ICI-based therapies in a previous systemic line. Methods: In this international, retrospective multicenter study, patients with HCC who received at least two lines of ICI-based therapies (ICI-1, ICI-2) at 14 institutions were eligible. The main outcomes included best overall response and treatment-related adverse events. Results: Of 994 ICI-treated patients screened, a total of 58 patients (male, n = 41; 71%) with a mean age of 65.0±9.0 years were included. Median systemic treatment lines of ICI-1 and ICI-2 were 1 (range, 1-4) and 3 (range, 2-9), respectively. ICI-based therapies used at ICI-1 and ICI-2 included ICI alone (ICI-1, n = 26, 45%; ICI-2, n = 4, 7%), dual ICI regimens (n = 1, 2%; n = 12, 21%), or ICI combined with targeted therapies/anti-VEGF (n = 31, 53%; n = 42, 72%). Most patients discontinued ICI-1 due to progression (n = 52, 90%). Objective response rate was 22% at ICI-1 and 26% at ICI-2. Responses at ICI-2 were also seen in patients who had progressive disease as best overall response at ICI-1 (n = 11/21; 52%). Median time-to-progression at ICI-1 and ICI-2 was 5.4 (95% CI 3.0-7.7) months and 5.2 (95% CI 3.3-7.0) months, respectively. Treatment-related adverse events of grade 3-4 at ICI-1 and ICI-2 were observed in 9 (16%) and 10 (17%) patients, respectively. Conclusions: ICI rechallenge was safe and resulted in a treatment benefit in a meaningful proportion of patients with HCC. These data provide a rationale for investigating ICI-based regimens in patients who progressed on first-line immunotherapy in prospective trials. Impact and implications: Therapeutic sequencing after first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains a challenge as no available second-line treatment options have been studied in immunotherapy-pretreated patients. Particularly, the role of ICI rechallenge in patients with HCC is unclear, as data from prospective trials are lacking. We investigated the efficacy and safety of ICI-based regimens in patients with HCC pretreated with immunotherapy in a retrospective, international, multicenter study. Our data provide the rationale for prospective trials investigating the role of ICI-based regimens in patients who have progressed on first-line immunotherapy.
13
Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Richard S. Finn, Shukui Qin, Masafumi Ikeda et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2020 · 7.2K citations · Full text
Medicine, Oncology, Pharmacotherapy +12
Tremelimumab plus Durvalumab in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Ghassan K. Abou‐Alfa, George Lau, Masatoshi Kudo et al. · NEJM Evidence · 2022 · 1.4K citations · Full text
Medicine, Oncology, Pharmacotherapy +16
Distinct Cellular Mechanisms Underlie Anti-CTLA-4 and Anti-PD-1 Checkpoint Blockade
Spencer C. Wei, Jacob Levine, Alexandria P. Cogdill et al. · Cell · 2017 · 1.3K citations · Full text
Medicine, Cancer Biology, Oncology +14