Geophysics · 2022 · 23 citations · 58 references
ComputingComputer ScienceGeophysicsComputer VisionMachine LearningSeismologyDeep LearningFault DetectionRepresentation LearningSeismic Data ProcessingSeismic ImagingSeismic InterpretationConvolutional Neural Network DetectionConvolutional Neural NetworksDeep Learning DetectionFault Detection Using Deep LearningSeismic Data InterpretationSeismic ModelingSeismic ProcessingSynthetic Image Generation
ABSTRACT Automatic fault detection in seismic images using deep learning-based methods has attracted great interest in recent years. Detecting faults by deep learning methods is generally considered a supervised learning task, which requires numerous diverse training samples and corresponding accurate labels. Because field data with faults labeled by experienced interpreters are difficult to acquire, training samples are usually generated synthetically, in which the 1D seismic wavelets are convolved with reflectivity models. However, the 1D-convolution-based synthetic seismic images still differ from the real seismic images. Therefore, the network trained by such samples may fail to detect some faults in the field data. Full-wavefield approaches are the optimal seismic modeling methods, but they cannot be widely used at present due to the high cost. In this paper, we present an efficient approach to generate realistic synthetic seismic images by using a point-spread function (PSF)-based convolution. Because the size of a seismic sample used for deep learning training is a small range relative to the field seismic data, assuming the background velocity is close to homogeneous in such a small range, we can efficiently construct the PSF using the analytical Green’s function. With an Intel Core i9-10900K CPU, the PSF approach takes approximately 15 min to generate a seismic image of size 128 × 128 × 128, whereas it takes approximately 20 h to generate a seismic image of the same size using reverse time migration. The examples of one synthetic image and two field seismic images demonstrate that the network trained with the PSF convolution samples can predict more accurate and continuous faults than that trained with the 1D convolution samples.
58
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
Kaiming He, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing Ren et al. · 2016 · 222.1K citations · Full text
Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation
Jonathan Long, Evan Shelhamer, Trevor Darrell · 2015 · 36.9K citations
Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Vision
Christian Szegedy, Vincent Vanhoucke, Sergey Ioffe et al. · 2016 · 30.9K citations
Squeeze-and-Excitation Networks
Holistically-Nested Edge Detection
Saining Xie, Zhuowen Tu · 2015 · 3.1K citations