Publication | Open Access
Post‐Roe emergency medicine: Policy, clinical, training, and individual implications for emergency clinicians
27
Citations
31
References
2022
Year
Individual ImplicationsHealth ReformConstitutional LawLawReproductive EthicsReproductive Justice (Reproductive Medicine)Health LawPost‐roe Emergency MedicineUnited StatesEmergency CarePublic Health LawMedical LawReproductive EthicFeminist HealthAbortion RightsReproductive RightsHealth PolicyEmergency Medicine TraumaReproductive LawAbortion EthicsEmergency Care SystemsEmergency DepartmentPre-hospital Emergency MedicineTrauma CareMedical EthicsAbortionConstitutional LitigationPatient SafetyEmergency CliniciansMedicineReproductive Justice (Black Feminist Studies)Emergency Medicine
In June 2022, the United States Supreme Court decision Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization overturned Roe v. Wade, removing almost 50 years of precedent and enabling the imposition of a wide range of state-level restrictions on abortion access. Historical data from the United States and internationally demonstrate that the removal of safe abortion options will increase complications and the health risks to pregnant patients. Because the emergency department is a critical access point for reproductive health care, emergency clinicians must be prepared for the policy, clinical, educational, and legal implications of this change. The goal of this paper, therefore, is to describe the impact of the reversal of Roe v. Wade on health equity and reproductive justice, the provision of emergency care education and training, and the specific legal and reproductive consequences for emergency clinicians. Finally, we conclude with specific recommended policy and advocacy responses for emergency medicine clinicians.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1