Concepedia

Publication | Open Access

<sup>18</sup>F-AlF-NOTA-Octreotide Outperforms<sup>68</sup>Ga-DOTATATE/NOC PET in Neuroendocrine Tumor Patients: Results from a Prospective, Multicenter Study

63

Citations

13

References

2022

Year

Abstract

<sup>18</sup>F-labeled somatostatin analogs (SSAs) could represent a valid alternative to the current gold standard, <sup>68</sup>Ga-labeled SSAs, for somatostatin receptor imaging in patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), given their logistic advantages. Recently, <sup>18</sup>F-AlF-NOTA-octreotide (<sup>18</sup>F-AlF-OC) has emerged as a promising candidate, but a thorough comparison with <sup>68</sup>Ga-DOTA-SSA in large patient groups is needed. This prospective, multicenter trial aims to demonstrate noninferiority of <sup>18</sup>F-AlF-OC compared with <sup>68</sup>Ga-DOTA-SSA PET in NET patients (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04552847). <b>Methods:</b> Seventy-five patients with histologically confirmed NET and routine clinical <sup>68</sup>Ga-DOTATATE (<i>n</i> = 56) or <sup>68</sup>Ga-DOTANOC (<i>n</i> = 19) PET, performed within a 3-mo interval of the study scan (median, 7 d; range, -30 to +32 d), were included. Patients underwent a whole-body PET 2 h after intravenous injection of 4 MBq/kg of <sup>18</sup>F-AlF-OC. A randomized, masked consensus read was performed by 2 experienced readers to count tumor lesions. After unmasking, the detection ratio (DR) was determined for each scan, that is, the fraction of lesions detected on a scan compared with the union of lesions of both scans. The differential DR (DDR; difference in DR between <sup>18</sup>F-AlF-OC and <sup>68</sup>Ga-DOTATATE/NOC) per patient was calculated. Tracer uptake was evaluated by comparing SUV<sub>max</sub> and tumor-to-background ratios in concordant lesions. <b>Results:</b> In total, 4,709 different tumor lesions were detected: 3,454 with <sup>68</sup>Ga-DOTATATE/NOC and 4,278 with <sup>18</sup>F-AlF-OC. The mean DR with <sup>18</sup>F-AlF-OC was significantly higher than with <sup>68</sup>Ga-DOTATATE/NOC (91.1% vs. 75.3%; <i>P</i> < 10<sup>-5</sup>). The resulting mean DDR was 15.8%, with a lower margin of the 95% CI (95% CI, 9.6%-22.0%) higher than -15%, which is the prespecified boundary for noninferiority. The mean DDRs for the <sup>68</sup>Ga-DOTATATE and <sup>68</sup>Ga-DOTANOC subgroups were 11.8% (95% CI, 4.3-19.3) and 27.5% (95% CI, 17.8-37.1), respectively. The mean DDR for most organs was higher than zero, except for bone lesions (mean DDR, -2.8%; 95% CI, -17.8 to 12.2). No significant differences in mean SUV<sub>max</sub> were observed (<i>P</i> = 0.067), but mean tumor-to-background ratio was significantly higher with <sup>18</sup>F-AlF-OC than with <sup>68</sup>Ga-DOTATATE/NOC (31.7 ± 36.5 vs. 25.1 ± 32.7; <i>P</i> = 0.001). <b>Conclusion:</b> <sup>18</sup>F-AlF-OC is noninferior and even superior to <sup>68</sup>Ga-DOTATATE/NOC PET in NET patients. This validates <sup>18</sup>F-AlF-OC as an option for clinical practice somatostatin receptor PET.

References

YearCitations

Page 1