International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · 2022 · 33 citations · 28 references
EngineeringChemical EngineeringEnvironmental EngineeringWaste ManagementWastewater TreatmentWater TreatmentNutrient RemovalPhosphorus RemovalPrimary TreatmentSludge TreatmentWastewater BiotreatmentWastewater ManagementBiological TreatmentMicroplastics In WastewaterMicroplastics RemovalRemovalSewage Sludge TreatmentWastewater Treatment PlantsWastewater Treatment ProcessesWastewater-borne Microplastics
Microplastic (MP) removal from wastewater was investigated using various types and doses of commercial coagulants (PIX, PAX) and flocculants (FPM, PEL, FCT) before primary clarification in a wastewater treatment plant (WWTP). Dosing with FPM, PIX, and PEL caused small MPs (180–212 µm) to be transferred mainly to the settled sludge (up to 86.4% of MP at a dose of 5 mL FMP/m3), while dosing of FCT and PAX caused these MPs to be transferred to the floated sludge (up to 64% MP at a dose of 5 mL PAX/m3). The efficiency of MP removal from wastewater was the highest (90%) with 2.5 mL PAX/m3; the generated primary sludge had a low MP content and could be safely managed in subsequent stages of sludge treatment. At the highest doses, PIX significantly increased the removal of P-PO4 (up to 94%) and COD (up to 73%). FPM and FCT resulted in over 40% efficiency of ammonium removal—such disturbance in wastewater composition may negatively affect further biological treatment. Effective removal of MP in the mechanical part of WWTP resulting from coagulation and flocculation enables the safe use of the excess sludge for agricultural purposes.
28
Mirka Lares, Mohamed Chaker Ncibi, Markus Sillanpää et al. · Water Research · 2018 · 1.3K citations · Full text
Engineering, Chemical Engineering, Environmental Engineering +17
Haerul Hidayaturrahman, Tae-Gwan Lee · Marine Pollution Bulletin · 2019 · 580 citations
Natural Sciences, Environmental Engineering, Environmental Sciences +14