Publication | Open Access
Publishing child development research from around the world: An unfair playing field resulting in most of the world's child population under‐represented in research
169
Citations
31
References
2022
Year
Development Studies (Infrastructure Engineering)Development EconomicsEducationChild Development ResearchGlobal StudiesSocial SciencesDevelopment Studies (Film Studies)Socioemotional DevelopmentChild PopulationHuman DevelopmentEarly Childhood ExperienceDevelopmental EpidemiologyInternational ResearchChild Well-beingEarly Childhood DevelopmentChild DevelopmentSociologyUnfair Playing FieldApplied Developmental ScienceChild Development JournalsChild Protection
Publishing child‑development research from the Majority World, Global South, non‑WEIRD, or low‑ and middle‑income countries is increasingly challenging. The paper aims to draw attention to these persistent challenges and provide constructive recommendations to improve representation of children from these countries in child‑development research. The authors review the history of publication bias in developmental science, discuss how research from these countries generalizes, and outline where it fits in the publishing landscape. The study highlights the need to explain context, warns of a vicious publication‑funding cycle, and offers specific recommendations to help journals create a more inclusive, equitable, diverse, and global child‑development field.
Abstract It has become increasingly apparent that publishing research on child development from certain countries is especially challenging. These countries have been referred to collectively as the Majority World, the Global South, non‐WEIRD (Western, Educated, Industrial, Rich, and Democratic), or low‐ and middle‐income countries. The aim of this paper is to draw attention to these persistent challenges, and provide constructive recommendations to contribute to better representation of children from these countries in child development research. In this paper, we outline the history of publication bias in developmental science, and issues of generalization of research from these countries and hence where it ‘fits’ in terms of publishing. The importance of explaining context is highlighted, including for research on measurement child development outcomes, and attention is drawn to the vicious publication‐funding cycle that further exacerbates the challenges of publishing this research. Specific recommendations are made to assist child development journals achieve their stated goals of creating a more inclusive, equitable, diverse, and global field of child development.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1