Publication | Open Access
Performance evaluation of deep learning object detectors for weed detection for cotton
90
Citations
46
References
2022
Year
Convolutional Neural NetworkImage ClassificationImage AnalysisMachine LearningMachine VisionData SciencePattern RecognitionObject DetectionObject RecognitionObject Detection ModelsEngineeringHerbicide-resistant WeedsWeed DatasetComputer ScienceWeed DetectionDeep LearningVision RecognitionComputer Vision
Alternative non-chemical or chemical-reduced weed control tactics are critical for future integrated weed management, especially for herbicide-resistant weeds. Through weed detection and localization, machine vision technology has the potential to enable site- and species-specific treatments targeting individual weed plants. However, due to unstructured field circumstances and the large biological variability of weeds, robust and accurate weed detection remains a challenging endeavor. Deep learning (DL) algorithms, powered by large-scale image data, promise to achieve the weed detection performance required for precision weeding. In this study, a three-class weed dataset with bounding box annotations was curated, consisting of 848 color images collected in cotton fields under variable field conditions. A set of 13 weed detection models were built using DL-based one-stage and two-stage object detectors, including YOLOv5, RetinaNet, EfficientDet, Fast RCNN and Faster RCNN, by transferring pretrained the object detection models to the weed dataset. RetinaNet (R101-FPN), despite its longer inference time, achieved the highest overall detection accuracy with a mean average precision ([email protected]) of 79.98%. YOLOv5n showed the potential for real-time deployment in resource-constraint devices because of the smallest number of model parameters (1.8 million) and the fastest inference (17 ms on the Google Colab) while achieving comparable detection accuracy (76.58% [email protected]). Data augmentation through geometric and color transformations could improve the accuracy of the weed detection models by a maximum of 4.2%. The software programs and the weed dataset used in this study are made publicly available (https://github.com/abdurrahman1828/DNNs-for-Weed-Detections; www.kaggle.com/yuzhenlu/cottonweeddet3).
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1