Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science · 1982 · 14 citations · 9 references
Life SciencesBotanyPlant SciencesPlant Developmental BiologyPlant EcophysiologyPlant PhysiologyLighting ControlsPlant Growth RegulationGrowth Performance Under Lighting RegimesIncandescent LightingLight Effects On EmergenceLight Effects On GrowthLight StressLight Stress PhysiologyLight-dark Cycle ResponsesPhotoperiodic Control Of Growth
Abstract Placing lily plants in complete darkness, with or without 12 hr per day of low intensity incandescent (Inc) lighting for 5 days at 5 day intervals during the first 40 days of growth after emergence (E) had no influence on final flower bud number. Low intensity Inc lighting given as a 4 hr night interruption under natural daylight (ND) conditions for 10 days at various intervals during the first 40 days after E had no horticulturally significant influence on flower bud number. Final lily plant heights were controlled by photoperiod. Heights were reduced when plants were forced under 8 hr photoperiods (SD) when compared to ND forced plants. Heights of ‘Ace’ and ‘Nellie White’ plants were reduced by 29% and 45% when forced under SD from E to flower (F), by 19% and 42% when forced from 30 days after E to F, and by 20% and 20% when forced from visible bud to F. Repetitive light/dark cycles of 4, 6 or 12 hr had no effect on lily flower bud development rate from the time buds were 6–12 cm in length to anthesis.
9
Promotion of Sink Activity of Developing Rose Shoots by Light
Yoram Mor, Abraham H. Halevy · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY · 1980 · 78 citations · Full text
Environment and the Experimental Control of Plant Growth
Ingrid Tichá · Biologia Plantarum · 1976 · 67 citations · Full text
Allan M. Armitage, William H. Carlson, J. A. Flore · Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science · 1981 · 45 citations · Full text