Frontiers in Oncology · 2022 · 17 citations · 25 references
MedicineOncologySurgerySurvival AnalysisUltrasonographyUltrasoundCancer StagingCancer Survival AnalysisEndometrial CancerPrognostic AssessmentUltrasound In OncologyUterine UltrasoundFigo ScoringFigo StagingKaplan-meier Confidence IntervalsLymph Node Involvement PrognosisLymphovascular Invasion PrognosisPreoperative Ultrasound AssessmentTumor DiameterTumor Size Prognosis
Objective: We aimed to assess the prognostic value of preoperative ultrasound tumor size in EC through a single center, observational, retrospective, cohort study. Methods: estimate tumor size, and a follow-up of at least 2-year, at our Institution from January 2010 to June 2018. Patients were divided into two groups based on different dimensional cut-offs for the maximum tumor diameter: 2, 3 and 4 cm. Differences in overall survival (OS), disease specific survival (DSS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed among the groups by using the Kaplan-Meier estimator and the log-rank test. Results: 108 patients were included in the study. OS, DSS and PFS did not significantly differ between the groups based on the different tumor diameter cut-offs. No significant differences were found among the groups sub-stratified by age, BMI, FIGO stage, FIGO grade, lymphovascular space invasion status, myometrial invasion, lymph nodal involvement, histotype, and adjuvant treatment. Conclusions: Preoperative ultrasound tumor size does not appear as a prognostic factor in EC women.
25
Erik von Elm, Douglas G. Altman, Matthias Egger et al. · International Journal of Surgery · 2014 · 9.9K citations · Full text
Public Health, Public Health Practice, Epidemiologic Methods +10
T. Van den Bosch, Margit Dueholm, F. Leone et al. · Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2015 · 727 citations · Full text
Medicine, Anatomy, Gynecology +17