Inverse Problems and Imaging · 2022 · 11 citations · 20 references
Natural SciencesMathematicsDifferential EquationsFluid DynamicsTransport PhenomenaBoundary ConditionsBoundary-value ProblemsElectrical ConductivityInverse ProblemsInverse Problems In MechanicsPartial Differential EquationsIll-posed Inverse ProblemsIll-posed Problem AnalysisInverse Boundary-value ProblemsInverse Conduction ProblemInverse Problems In Partial Differential EquationsOpen SetsUniqueness In Inverse ProblemsUniqueness Theorems For Partial Differential Equations
<p style='text-indent:20px;'>We construct counterexamples for the partial data inverse problem for the fractional conductivity equation in all dimensions on general bounded open sets. In particular, we show that for any bounded domain <inline-formula><tex-math id="M1">\begin{document}$ \Omega \subset {\mathbb R}^n $\end{document}</tex-math></inline-formula> and any disjoint open sets <inline-formula><tex-math id="M2">\begin{document}$ W_1, W_2 \Subset {\mathbb R}^n \setminus \overline{\Omega} $\end{document}</tex-math></inline-formula> there always exist two positive, bounded, smooth, conductivities <inline-formula><tex-math id="M3">\begin{document}$ \gamma_1, \gamma_2 $\end{document}</tex-math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><tex-math id="M4">\begin{document}$ \gamma_1 \neq \gamma_2 $\end{document}</tex-math></inline-formula>, with equal partial exterior Dirichlet-to-Neumann maps <inline-formula><tex-math id="M5">\begin{document}$ \Lambda_{\gamma_1}f|_{W_2} = \Lambda_{\gamma_2}f|_{W_2} $\end{document}</tex-math></inline-formula> for all <inline-formula><tex-math id="M6">\begin{document}$ f \in C_c^{\infty}(W_1) $\end{document}</tex-math></inline-formula>. The proof uses the characterization of equal exterior data from another work of the authors in combination with the maximum principle of fractional Laplacians. The main technical difficulty arises from the requirement that the conductivities should be strictly positive and have a special regularity property <inline-formula><tex-math id="M7">\begin{document}$ \gamma_i^{1/2}-1 \in H^{2s, \frac{n}{2s}}( {\mathbb R}^n) $\end{document}</tex-math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><tex-math id="M8">\begin{document}$ i = 1, 2 $\end{document}</tex-math></inline-formula>. We also provide counterexamples on domains that are bounded in one direction when <inline-formula><tex-math id="M9">\begin{document}$ n \geq 4 $\end{document}</tex-math></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><tex-math id="M10">\begin{document}$ s \in (0, n/4] $\end{document}</tex-math></inline-formula> when <inline-formula><tex-math id="M11">\begin{document}$ n = 2, 3 $\end{document}</tex-math></inline-formula> using a modification of the argument on bounded domains.
20
Analysis and Approximation of Nonlocal Diffusion Problems with Volume Constraints
Qiang Du, Max Gunzburger, Richard B. Lehoucq et al. · SIAM Review · 2012 · 587 citations
Engineering, Mathematics, Physics +17
Electrical impedance tomography and Calderón's problem
Günther Uhlmann · Inverse Problems · 2009 · 433 citations
Invisibility and inverse problems
Allan Greenleaf, Yaroslav Kurylev, Matti Lassas et al. · Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society · 2008 · 159 citations · Full text