Publication | Open Access
Recommendations for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results in scoping reviews
1.4K
Citations
15
References
2022
Year
Best-practice ExamplesResearch EvaluationResearch EthicsCommunicationJournalismProgram EvaluationQualitative InterpretationAuditingQuality ReviewConversation AnalysisLanguage StudiesEvaluation MethodologyContent AnalysisReview GuidanceResearch SynthesisNursingQualitative AnalysisSoftware ReviewReview ResultsArtsEvaluation Technique
Scoping reviewers often face challenges in the extraction, analysis, and presentation of scoping review results. Using best-practice examples and drawing on the expertise of the JBI Scoping Review Methodology Group and an editor of a journal that publishes scoping reviews, this paper expands on existing JBI scoping review guidance. The aim of this article is to clarify the process of extracting data from different sources of evidence; discuss what data should be extracted (and what should not); outline how to analyze extracted data, including an explanation of basic qualitative content analysis; and offer suggestions for the presentation of results in scoping reviews.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1