MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report · 2022 · 42 citations · 8 references
Veterinary MedicineInfectious DiseasesMicrobiologyInfectious Disease EpidemiologyOutbreak InvestigationVirologyMolecular SurveillanceSexually Transmitted InfectionsViral EpidemiologyViral InfectionsEarly Case DetectionReal-time Polymerase Chain Reaction (Pcr)Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction AssaysTransmission Risk FactorsViral Outbreak InvestigationViral Risk Assessment
Since May 2022, approximately 20,000 cases of monkeypox have been identified in the United States, part of a global outbreak occurring in approximately 90 countries and currently affecting primarily gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (MSM) (1). Monkeypox virus (MPXV) spreads from person to person through close, prolonged contact; a small number of cases have occurred in populations who are not MSM (e.g., women and children), and testing is recommended for persons who meet the suspected case definition* (1). CDC previously developed five real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays for detection of orthopoxviruses from lesion specimens (2,3). CDC was granted 510(k) clearance for the nonvariola-orthopoxvirus (NVO)-specific PCR assay by the Food and Drug Administration. This assay was implemented within the Laboratory Response Network (LRN) in the early 2000s and became critical for early detection of MPXV and implementation of public health action in previous travel-associated cases as well as during the current outbreak (4-7). PCR assays (NVO and other Orthopoxvirus laboratory developed tests [LDT]) represent the primary tool for monkeypox diagnosis. These tests are highly sensitive, and cross-contamination from other MPXV specimens being processed, tested, or both alongside negative specimens can occasionally lead to false-positive results. This report describes three patients who had atypical rashes and no epidemiologic link to a monkeypox case or known risk factors; these persons received diagnoses of monkeypox based on late cycle threshold (Ct) values ≥34, which were false-positive test results. The initial diagnoses were followed by administration of antiviral treatment (i.e., tecovirimat) and JYNNEOS vaccine postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) to patients' close contacts. After receiving subsequent testing, none of the three patients was confirmed to have monkeypox. Knowledge gained from these and other cases resulted in changes to CDC guidance. When testing for monkeypox in specimens from patients without an epidemiologic link or risk factors or who do not meet clinical criteria (or where these are unknown), laboratory scientists should reextract and retest specimens with late Ct values (based on this report, Ct ≥34 is recommended) (8). CDC can be consulted for complex cases including those that appear atypical or questionable cases and can perform additional viral species- and clade-specific PCR testing and antiorthopoxvirus serologic testing.
8
Evaluation of D-Dimer in the Diagnosis of Suspected Deep-Vein Thrombosis
Philip S. Wells, David R. Anderson, Marc Rodger et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2003 · 1.5K citations · Full text
Detection of monkeypox virus with real-time PCR assays
Yu Li, Victoria A. Olson, Thomas M. Laue et al. · Journal of Clinical Virology · 2006 · 485 citations · Full text
Epidemiologic and Clinical Characteristics of Monkeypox Cases — United States, May 17–July 22, 2022
David Philpott, Christine M. Hughes, Karen A. Alroy et al. · MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report · 2022 · 388 citations · Full text
Veterinary Medicine, Infectious Disease Control, Infectious Diseases +15