Journal of Nuclear Medicine · 2022 · 47 citations · 20 references
MedicineNuclear MedicineUrologyDiagnostic ImagingHybrid ImagingOncologic Nuclear MedicineActive SurveillanceOncologic Nuclear ImagingProstate CancerProstate Cancer ImagingProstate ImagingTumor Receptor ImagingGastrin Releasing Peptide Receptor ImagingNeuropeptide Receptor SubtypesProstate Cancer DiagnosisProstate Cancer LocalizationProstate-specific Membrane Antigen PetProstate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission TomographyPsma-pet ImagingPsma-targeted Therapy
Considering the wide range of therapeutic options for localized prostate cancer (e.g., active surveillance, radiation-beam therapy, focal therapy, and radical prostatectomy), accurate assessment of the aggressiveness and localization of primary prostate cancer lesions is essential for treatment decision making. National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines recognize prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT for use in initial staging of high-risk primary prostate cancer. The gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRP-R) is a neuropeptide receptor overexpressed by low-risk prostate cancer cells. We aimed to perform the first (to our knowledge) prospective head-to-head comparison of PSMA- and GRP-R–targeted imaging at initial staging to understand how PSMA PET and GRP-R PET can be used or combined in clinical practice. <b>Methods:</b> This was a prospective, single-center, diagnostic cross-sectional imaging study using anonymized, masked, and independent interpretations of paired PET/CT studies in 22 patients with <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-617 (a radiolabeled PSMA inhibitor) and <sup>68</sup>Ga-RM2 (<sup>68</sup>Ga-DOTA-4-amino-1-carboxymethylpiperidine-d-Phe-Gln-Trp-Ala-Val-Gly-His-Sta-Leu-NH2, a radiolabeled GRP-R antagonist). We enrolled patients with newly diagnosed, biopsy-proven prostate cancer. None had received neoadjuvant hormone therapy or chemotherapy, and all underwent extended pelvic lymph node dissection. Histologic findings served as a reference. <b>Results:</b> On a lesion-based analysis (including lesions < 0.1 cm<sup>3</sup>), <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-617 PET/CT detected 74.3% (26/35) of all tumor lesions and <sup>68</sup>Ga-RM2 PET/CT detected 78.1% (25/32; 1 patient could not be offered <sup>68</sup>Ga-RM2 PET/CT). Paired examinations showed positive uptake of the 2 tracers in 21 of 32 lesions (65.6%), negative uptake in 5 of 32 lesions (15.6%), and discordant uptake in 6 of 32 lesions (18.8%). Uptake of <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-617 was higher when the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) score was at least 4 versus at least 1 (<i>P</i> < 0.0001) or 2 (<i>P</i> = 0.0002). There were no significant differences in uptake between ISUP scores for <sup>68</sup>Ga-RM2. Median <sup>68</sup>Ga-RM2 SUV<sub>max</sub> was significantly higher than median <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-617 SUV<sub>max</sub> in the ISUP-2 subgroup (<i>P</i> = 0.01). <b>Conclusion:</b><sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-617 PET/CT is useful to depict higher, more clinically significant ISUP score lesions, and <sup>68</sup>Ga-RM2 PET/CT has a higher detection rate for low-ISUP tumors. Combining PSMA PET and GRP-R PET allows for better classification of intraprostatic lesions.
20
Rebecca L. Siegel, Kimberly D. Miller, Ahmedin Jemal · CA A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · 2017 · 15K citations · Full text
Ali Afshar‐Oromieh, Henrik Hetzheim, Clemens Kratochwil et al. · Journal of Nuclear Medicine · 2015 · 426 citations · Full text
Medicine, Nuclear Medicine, Oncology +17
Christian Uprimny, Alexander Kroiss, Clemens Decristoforo et al. · European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging · 2017 · 342 citations
Medicine, Nuclear Medicine, Oncology +17